3 marks of existence
Upvote:0
Hello with much metta!!! The Buddha taught three truths that are omnipresent in Samsara.
These are: - Impermanence - Suffering - No-Self
IMPERMANENCE With every thought moment, everything in Samsara is never the exact same thing it is, nor different than what it is. Some conditioned things might seem the exact same for a while, but be assured, it is changing & with time, one can come to see this, itβs only very slowly changing. Nothing can ever be lost, only changed, just like us with our awareness & Rebirth!
SUFFERING Dukkha is caused by the lack of accepting impermanence. Everything you cling to dearly is but a debt that will be payed fully with, ultimately, every death. When one comes to see the nature of Samsara suffering will end & peace will take its place.
NO-SELF Nothing in Samsara exists independent of the mind or as an intrinsic thing. All things are dependent on each other. Rid one thing, and all cannot exist. This also includes you. You do not have βself,β you are but five impermanent aggregates mixed together: Consciousness, form (body), sensations, perceptions, & mental formations. There is no you. What continues for a Rebirth you say? Awareness, ever changing consciousness, streaming though Samsara until it finds a way to evaporate into Nibbana.
Hopefully this helps!
Thank you Venerable Buddha for showing us the Dhamma in this time!
May you have loving-kindness, generosity, & wisdom!
Upvote:1
The three characteristics are characteristics of phenomena and are not related to mental reactions to things. "Dukkha" here does not mean "getting distraught". "Dukkha" meaning "getting distraught" pertains to the subject of the Four Noble Truths but not to the subject of the Three Characteristics.
For example, a motor car is impermanent. Because a motor car is impermanent, the motor car cannot bring lasting happiness. Therefore it is "dukkha" ("unable to bring happiness"). The impermanence of the motor car also makes it "not-self" because it cannot be permanently owned, possessed or controlled. To view a motor car in this way does not mean the viewer "gets distraught". For the Enlightened, it is the opposite. Their minds attain peace when understanding a motor car cannot bring lasting true happiness.
Upvote:1
Above should be revised as:
Everything that is conditioned is impermanent (anicca), thus we get distraught (dukkha), and thus we are not in control (anatta).
More post
- π Cessation of TaαΉhΔ through not giving a f*ck
- π Has anyone claimed to have reborn in Pure Land, and later returned to earth to help other beings?
- π Body scan guided meditation that covers only the upper body?
- π What are the main warning signs in a Buddhist centre?
- π A text where The Blessed One calls "a monk" a 'householder'?
- π If a snake is eating a frog in front of me, what should I do?
- π Is ChΓΆgyal Namkhai Norbu correct when he says our life is unreal and that Buddha taught that life is just like a dream?
- π Reason of pandemics
- π Generosity in Buddhism - When does giving become unwholesome?
- π Do I carry false identity?
- π How do Mahayana and Vajrayana Buddhists make sense of Maitreya's prophecy?
- π Why buddhists love staying in hills?
- π Ambition and Expectation
- π Social context of Buddhist rituals
- π How important is lineage in Buddhism?
- π What are the effects of discourageing one from going forth?
- π If I am not the skandhas, then what entity/group of entities am I being responsible for by being a good person?
- π Upaya in Theravada Buddhism and the Pali Canon
- π Would you say the "dharma" explains "dharmas"
- π Most beneficial Buddhist organizations and monastic orders?
- π Permanent brain damage can cause someone to loose their Arihathness?
- π Sunyata and Void. How can be the void without a super consciousness?
- π If Buddhists believe that life is just suffering why don't they just kill themselves?
- π Does the Pali Canon say anything about duty to siblings?
- π Laws of the land, and Buddhist virtues and precepts
- π Contemplation versus meditation
- π Panpsychism and philosophical interpretations of buddhism
- π Death according to various schools of buddism
- π If A is killed by B due to A's past karma of killing B, will B suffer from this karma of killing A?
- π Why does Buddhism use the word "realm" when describing one of the different races?
Source: stackoverflow.com
Search Posts
Related post
- π Pure Land Schools' version of the Three (or Four) Marks of Existence
- π How are the three marks of existence experienced through Samadhi meditation?
- π 3 marks of existence
- π What are the three marks of existence?
- π Supernatural beings and the 31 planes of existence
- π Is it necessary for a Buddhist to believe that existence is suffering?
- π The six realms of existence
- π How did this material world come into existence if the ultimate reality is voidness?
- π Buddha's tooth, ashes, footprints and other marks
- π How does Buddhism refute the inherent existence of sub-atomic particles?
- π Is lack of inherent existence the same as 'not real'?
- π Do Cittamatra / Yogacara explicitly refute the existence of an external world?
- π What are signs of the three marks of existence?
- π My explanation of six realms of existence
- π How can I smile when existence itself is dukkha?
- π Why would existence remove my knowledge after reicarnation?
- π Can you explain how cessation of existence is known to be possible?
- π A question about DN 23 and existence of soul
- π Why is 'dukkha' included in one of the three marks of existence?
- π Is nirodha (cessation of suffering) dependent on the existence of suffering?
- π How to overcome the suffering of attachement to the body's continued existence (in Western modernity)?
- π How do Buddhists reconcile "Anatta" with Buddha supporting the existence of the Self in the Mahayana Mahaparininirvana Sutra?
- π Can new beings come into existence without this existence being a rebirth?
- π A man asks Buddha about god's existence
- π Is dukkha conventional or ultimate? Is it different from the other two marks of existence?
- π Why can't existence be mostly good?
- π 3 marks of existence: conditioned vs unconditioned things?
- π The invariant law of nature which forms the basis of Buddha's Dharma and existence of universe itself
- π What are the boundaries of existence and non-existence in Buddhism?
- π If science can't prove the existence of other dimensions forever