Upvote:1
Visa application forms often have a question about a person's occupation. In your case, you have finished your education but have not yet joined the work force. Other people are 'between jobs' or in some other similar circumstance where they are not earning a regular salary.
The problem arises when applicants feel that disclosing their employment circumstances in explicit terms may bring about an adverse result (i.e., a visa refusal). But on the other hand, to provide misleading or false information invites the possibility of a credibility problem (i.e., deception or bogus applicant). In the Schengen realm, this is Schengen Visa Refusal: Justification for the purpose and conditions of the intended stay was not reliable and in the UK realm, they like to use UK visa refusal on V 4.2 a + c (and sometimes 'e')
As a reality check, let's understand that visa decision makers are not idiots and they can quickly see an applicant's real circumstances and lifestyle based on a composite of the evidence provided. But more to the point, decision makers are also educated and went through the same period earlier in their own lives. They are also aware that the 'intermezzo' between school and serious professional employment is a great opportunity to travel and observe other cultures, probably many of them did it themselves.
So contrary to the intuitive reservations people have about disclosing their status, being a school leaver can actually help establish the applicant as a bona fide visitor. It's a great premise! And since the applicant's circumstances will be apparent to the decision maker anyway, there is nothing to be gained by trying to hide that one is between vocations. So ways to answer the 'Occupation' question might be...
Or any other answer that accomplishes the applicant's burden of transparent disclosure. These are examples are not a complete list.
The inevitable corollary is "if I put this down, the decision-maker might think I will be seeking employment!" Yes, but this is always true and it will always be part of the applicant's burden to prove that they are a bona fide visitor. And which is preferable: a decision-maker who thinks you are being honest? Or a decision-maker who thinks you are trying to hide something?
This is a great term and its definition is...
a year spent travelling abroad, typically immediately before or after a university or college course.
We'll broaden the term to include those who are in established careers and have been working for a long time and are now taking an extended break to travel and experience other cultures.
In these cases, the 'occupation' is what you have been doing in your professional life, like "Engineer", "IT Developer", "Actress", "Administrator".
There are cases where a professional qualification can only be earned in Europe. This is typified by the UK's PLAB qualification for entry-level physicians. Once again, there is nothing to be gained by attempting to obfuscate one's circumstances. The occupation can be
Because there is a "niche, corner-case" for PLAB applicants, there is a section in UK visa refusal on V 4.2 a + c (and sometimes 'e') devoted to it. There is another corner case for those seeking to take the British Army Assessment. These people can use "Physical Fitness/Career Military Aspirant" or something similar that conveys the same meaning.
There is nothing to be gained by trying to blur one's status or circumstances and attempting to do so can actually lead to a worse result.
Miscellaneous notes and thoughts: