Upvote:1
For a very interesting analysis of how US policy WWII for a specific issue was developed, may I recommend Advocating Overlord by Philip Padgett, Potomac Books, $39.95, 379 pp. Nothing in it contradicts the excellent answer by JMS or the original question, but by showing how a real, major policy decision was arrived at nicely illustrates the complexity of it all. (Real life decision-making is never as pretty as in the movies!)
If I had to summarize brutally, FDR always held 66% of the votes and the other 33% were scattered. He was brilliant and effective, but had a tendency to change his mind unpredictably, especially after talking to Churchill. Many of his aides saw their task to help him form his best judgment and then, once decided, to stick to it.
Upvote:1
An interesting perspective on this question can be had from the book 'The First Summit: Roosevelt & Churchill at Placentia Bay, 1941' by Theodore A. Wilson (1991), which describes the lead-up and activities of the two national leaders and their key advisors as they formulated the Atlantic Charter in 1941. Much of the final work was conducted on board ships in Placentia Bay and those who were present and those who were excluded becomes very evident in such isolated and confined circumstances. The contrasting methods and style of the two great leaders is a prominent theme as is the detailed descriptions of who was involved in the key negotiations over contentious matters which shaped the direction of the future Anglo-US alliance and their vision for the world which would emerge from the war under their guidance. Hopkins and Welles appear to me as the two (non-military) men who had the fullest attention of the President at that pivotal time.
Upvote:3
Question:
Who advised FDR on Foreign Policy before and during WWII?
I've been thinking about this question and done a fare bit of research on it. Here are my conclusions.
My original question was flawed in that it drew a distinction between foreign policy and economic policy. In Roosevelt's time, especially in his first six years when he was primarily focused on rebuilding the economy the two were closely related. The United States was the largest economy in the world, and it's economic policy was an important component of foreign policy before WWII preparations began. Important economic issues blended into foreign policy.
FDR 1933, Inaugural Address
(sandwiched between two blurb on domestic economic policy)
"In the field of World policy, I would dedicate this nation to the policy of the good neighbor, the neighbor who resolutely respects himself and, because he does so, respects the rights of others, the neighbor who respects his obligations and respects the sanctity of his agreements in and with a World of neighbors."
I found many references to people calling themselves an FDR primary advisor in foreign policy. Also groups of people claiming to be the intellectual visionaries for post world war Europe as well as the cold war. The problems with all of the folks I researched was:
They didn't span FDR's entire 12 years in office, most only came into his service for 2 or three years. Advisors who rose to prominence in the FDR administration during the war in the mid 1940's don't meet the criteria of who we are looking for.
Others were relatively low level staffers when FDR was making monumental decisions. One would figure if FDR had a young foreign policy guru, he would have kept him around for more than a year or two and he would have been posted to DC close to FDR.
Some of the folks I Investigated.
All of these men would become very influential in the Truman and Eisenhower administrations and all would claim to have advised FDR. I crossed off a lot of people whos influence peaked only after FDR left office. Folks who claimed to be his foreign policy primary advisors / visionaries. What I came away with was that FDR ran his foreign policy a lot like he ran his economic policy.
He hired and listened to a lot of advisors who had two things in common. They were all smart opinionated guys, and the pretty much disagreed on important policy positions. Roosevelt would hire two guys who disagreed and put them in the same office as deputies, or one as chief and the other as deputy. He would invite both along to the Whitehouse and orchestrate a conversation where ideas would be debated with FDR as referee. FDR generally did not participate in these debates but just listened and asked questions. It was not uncommon in these meetings for many people of different opinions to all come away thinking they each had the president's favor. FDR would make the final call, usually in private and sometimes didn't even inform his subordinates of the decisions.
Functional ability and performance were prized but typically isolated from policy making. Thus guys like his secretary of state Cordell Hull were trusted with running the State Department but were not authoritative or even necessarily included in crafting foreign policy.
Important Cabinet officials like FDR's first two Secretaries of War:
Publicly disagreed with FDR over foundational administration policy. Woodring was a public noninterventionist was so incensed by FDR's appointment of interventionist Louis A. Johnson as his deputy he refused to speak to him. Finally FDR fired Woodring after he publicly spoke out criticizing Lend Lease.
Policy came from FDR and from his own process. FDR's subordinates were encouraged to criticize and disagree internally, and present their cases. Public criticism was a different matter.
FDR's charm and ability to craft close relationships with his subordinates was legendary. ( close from the subordinates vantage ). FDR spoke both German and French fluently, and read all the important daily newspapers and popular literature from Britain, France and Germany. ( skimmed, more than completely read ). FDR had a long standing interest in intelligence dating back from when he was assistant secretary of War for the Wilson Administration and built and championed US naval intelligence. FDR had three or four different groups thinking they were the US governments clandestine service only to be surprised when they would discover others working in the same space all orchestrated by FDR.
Answer.
As a fluent speaker in both German and French, FDR was incredible well informed. He augmented his knowledge obtained from public resources by surrounding himself with opinionated smart experienced people recruited for the diversity of their ideas. He would place people with these diverse ideas over core policy issues in the same space. Sometimes as peers sometimes as a chief and subordinate. Such as his noninterventionist Secretary of war Harry Hines Woodring and his interventionist deputy Louis A. Johnson.
Many many of his subordinates be low the secretary level were invited to the White House for policy meetings and believed they had FDR's ear and confidence. FDR managed these relationships carefully and from the Presidential perspective had only a very few inner circle advisors who were more valued for their work ethic, managerial skills, and personal loyalty than their incite and deep experience on a given foreign policy topic which they were aiding FDR with. Harry Hopkins for example was a social worker by training who had come to Roosevelt's attention as the leader of a charity working to ease the impact of the Depression on working families. FDR employed him as a special envoy to Churchill and Stalin, as well as a war materials production czar. FDR's inner circle confidants like Harry Hopkins, Eleanor, and Missy leland worked behind the scenes and perhaps helped FDR sort out all the information which he accumulated from various experts. This is how FDR ran his economic and foreign policy decisions.
If a single Guru had to be named it would be FDR himself. FDR was very secretive, and guarded; while he projected an image of giving power to many. In truth he sought advice widely, but shared authority and power infrequently and then only in silo's were implementation was isolated from policy. His close advisors were not policy people but hardworking people with demonstrated managerial skills and huge work ethics who placed FDR's relationship ahead of policy. These people were trusted to act as FDR's eyes and ears, relay personal messages and sometimes implement policy. Subject matter experts, many of whom considered FDR their close personal friend, were kept at arms length and milked for ideas. Their relationships were carefully managed and they were prized for coming up with innovative ideas and being able to defend those ideas against a gauntlet of detractors all organized and carefully nurtured by FDR. Overall FDR's approach lead to some mistakes even large ones. FDR get's high marks for not because he never made mistakes, but because when he did he was quick to recognize them and take action.