Was it common to brush off Hitler's radical remarks as just figures of speech to whip up the supporters among US commentators in the 1930's?
score:32
Boingboing.net might not be the most appropriate source for historical documents, but they share a picture from an article in the New York Times from Nov 22. 1922 with the following quote:
"Several reliable, well-informed sources confirmed the idea that Hitler's anti-Semitism was not so genuine or violent as it sounded, and that he was merely using anti-Semitic propaganda as a bait to catch masses of followers and keep them aroused, enthusiastic, and in line for the time when his organization is perfected and sufficiently powerful to be employed effectively for political purposes."
The original article is available for NYT subscribers only on their website.
Alan Bullock (a British historian and contemporary of Hitler who later wrote a biography of Hitler) is quoted in an article by the German Newspaper "Die Zeit":
„Der Fehler, den wir alle begangen haben [..] war da wohl, dies für reine Rhetorik zu halten, obwohl es ganz wörtlich gemeint war"
which translates to
"The mistake, made by all of us, [..] was to consider it (sc. Hitlers political program as per "Mein Kampf") simply rhetoric, even though it was meant quite literally"
But that was said long after the fact.
I am still digging for German quotes, but so far it seems the only one who suggested to take Hitlers program not too seriously was Hitler himself when he promised to tone down and adhere strictly to the law in his bid for chancellorship.
Half an hour later and after digging trough the literature the closest German quote I can come up with is a editorial in the newspaper of the Centralverein deutscher Staatsbürger jüdischen Glaubens which commented after Hitler became Chancellor:
"Auch in dieser Zeit werden die deutschen Juden ihre Ruhe nicht verlieren, die ihnen das Bewusstsein untrennbarer Verbundenheit mit allem wirklich deutschen gibt"
In english:
"Even in these times, German Jews won't lose the peace and inseparable bond that they know exists between them and everything that is truly German
Even that this does not refer specifically to Hitler and sounds rather like a plea hoping that national socialist politics would not come to pass (quoted as per Friedländers "Das Dritte Reich und die Juden", translation by me).
All in all it seems that Adolf Hitler was taken pretty seriously in his home country.
Upvote:7
Here's a couple quotes from a 1932 article in Foreign Affairs called "Hitler: Phenomenon and Portent". This was written by Paul Scheffer, the Washington correspondent of a German newspaper called Berliner Tageblatt. The newspaper was shut down by the Nazis in 1939.
Hitler's adversaries are right in charging that such an audience can easily be misused. Hitler's utterances on the subject of propaganda, both from the platform and in print, show in fact that he is willing to use any means which he judges serviceable in winning adherents to his cause. He fans the flames of hatred just as unscrupulously as he arouses the most exaggerated hopes.
[...]
They hate "the plutocrats." Their battle cry is about what they call the "Jewish financial tyranny," an artificial scarecrow, devised ad hoc, and aimed at one individual or another. Propaganda requires such things.
[...]
The foregoing will perhaps help one to understand the simple primitive impulses on which Hitler continually plays in order to draw the masses to him. One may find them understandable, and even see in them much that is constructive for the preservation of Germany. But a person may well be shocked at the expression which Hitler and his people have given to the forces which they have mobilized, and wince at the anti-Semitism and the chauvinism which he is ever stirring up with such reckless skill.
It is important here to distinguish between the propagandist aspect of the Hitler movement and its realistic political aspect. On the one side it is devoted wholly to the acquisition of power, and so drives unscrupulously ahead as all such movements do. On the other side it has to consider the exercise of power, or at least preparations for such exercise. What National Socialism, once in power, will become under the pressure of adverse conditions, under the influence of the German temperament which is by nature disinclined to extremes, is the real question -- a question not answerable today, but which the student of foreign affairs must consider quite apart from watchwords of the moment.
It is evident that Hitler himself is impressed by the fact that his movement is predominantly of an emotional character and is held together by sentiment. His movement lives in opposition and on opposition. How will it act when it is called upon to deal with the tremendously difficult concrete problems which confront Germany both at home and abroad? Can the movement be carried over into practical politics?
[...]
Efficiency is to be rewarded with tolerance. Even a Jewish minister of finance -- the thing has actually been said -- is not beyond the range of possibility. As regards anti-Semitism, there are proofs that in matters political Hitler recognizes not only the absolute, but also the relative! In practical terms, trouble will be made only for the "immigrant Jew" who has not "fitted himself in."
More post
- 📝 Einstein's World War IV quote?
- 📝 Why did the Nazis collaborate with the Ustaše?
- 📝 Why does Spain have enclaves in Morocco?
- 📝 What is the corruption that John Winthrop mentions in "Reasons for the Plantation in New England" (1628)
- 📝 What is the origin of the expression "I'm the culture they're dying for"?
- 📝 How were documents written in Plato's time?
- 📝 Why are modern tanks regiments called cavalry?
- 📝 What were George Washington's beliefs behind the Church of England and Catholic practice?
- 📝 What trains were used on the Dakar-Niger Railway in the late 1950s and early 1960s?
- 📝 Do we have any surviving texts by Romano-Celtic authors?
- 📝 Is there footage of Valery Legasov's report at the IAEA Conference in Vienna?
- 📝 When did the U.S. Army start saying "oh-six-hundred" for "6 AM"?
- 📝 Religious sectarianism as the primary cause of the Bosnian War
- 📝 Has the side with better equipment and worse logistics ever won?
- 📝 What name was given to this ancient Roman custom involving a broken pot to show a pact between individuals?
- 📝 What are the social preconditions for division of labour, when compared in different emerging civilizations?
- 📝 What rank did cadet branches hold in the peerage?
- 📝 What is the historical basis for the claim that "Taiwan has always been part of China"?
- 📝 Why was there an autumn recess in Britain in 1641?
- 📝 How could a man be made a bishop of a place while not having received major orders?
- 📝 Were there regionalist/independentist movements or feelings in mid-19th century Spain?
- 📝 Was there any connection between the Ottonians and Benedictines?
- 📝 Why did France make an alliance with the Kingdom of Sardinia-Piedmont in the 1850's?
- 📝 What was the relation between the biblical king Herod and the Parthian king Orodes II?
- 📝 Why are lower court jurists, judges, and supreme court jurists, justices?
- 📝 Which countries banned Ferdinand the bull?
- 📝 Why did James Baldwin call it "magnificent twenties"?
- 📝 Why did the negotiations between Henry V of England and France fail?
- 📝 To what degree is Simone Weil correct in arguing that the third Reich under Hitler was merely a revival of imperial Rome?
- 📝 Was slavery abolished in the Kingdom of Hungary, and if so, when?
Source: stackoverflow.com
Search Posts
Related post
- 📝 Was it common to brush off Hitler's radical remarks as just figures of speech to whip up the supporters among US commentators in the 1930's?
- 📝 Was frequent bathing for personal hygiene in medieval Europe common or not?
- 📝 How common was smoking in first half of the 20th century?
- 📝 How common was marriage between nobles and peasants in the Middle Ages?
- 📝 Was the act of servicemen exchanging their weapons for enemy weapons common during WWII?
- 📝 Did Hitler have an end goal during the "appeas*m*nt" phase, or was he just picking a fight?
- 📝 How common was banditry in 16th & 17th century Great Britain and Ireland?
- 📝 How common was it for people to live 80+ years in the 17th century?
- 📝 Was hitchhiking common in ancient Rome?
- 📝 How common was it for un-documented ships to bring settlers to the American colonies 1700-1750
- 📝 How common was decimation in the Roman army?
- 📝 Was rape common in Europe during the Middle Ages?
- 📝 Was it common practice in Victorian London or other Western European cities to name locations as places where fictional characters lived and acted?
- 📝 How common was it for Americans to visit Europe in the late 19th century?
- 📝 How common was drug abuse and related deaths in the USA during the conservative 1950s?
- 📝 Was there anything in common between the War of 1812 between Britain and America and the War of 1812 between Napoleon and Russia?
- 📝 Was Marshal Foch predicting WW2 20 years in advance just a coincidence?
- 📝 What evidence exists to say whether or not FDR was planning to use the Atomic Bomb just as Truman did?
- 📝 Before iron was common, what did common people use for door hinges?
- 📝 Was it common practice for men to kiss on the lips in 1920s USA?
- 📝 How common was the German desire for revenge for the humiliation of 1918 armistice?
- 📝 How common was gun ownership by Londoners in the early 20th century?
- 📝 What was the reaction of Western Communist Parties to Kruschev's 1956 speech denouncing Stalin?
- 📝 Was throwing hammers as weapons common during European medieval combat?
- 📝 How common was it for USAAF aircrews to swap airplanes?
- 📝 In Montgomery, Alabama, how common was it to be arrested for sitting in the incorrect section of the bus?
- 📝 How common was cavalry in medieval Brittany?
- 📝 In XIXth century lower classes families, was it common for kids to witness their parent's intercourse?
- 📝 Was Roman expansion & casus belli as just as they claimed?
- 📝 How common was capturing a post-sail warship?