Is that armistice wagon photograph authentic?
score:14
The photo is authentic. It is in numerous reliable archives. The exact time given in one wikipedia is just overly precise. That is: wrong. No other Wikipedia page gives that time.
French Wikipedia: On November 11, 1918, around 5:30 a.m., just after the signing of the treaty, at the exit of the "Armistice wagon": in the foreground with a cane and a kepi, Marshal Foch, surrounded by the British admirals Hope (right) and Wemyss (left).
Looking at the picture more closely reveals things Evargalo noticed in a comment:
I don't believe artificial lights could help taking such a picture by night. It might enlighten the front scene (the characters and the wagon), but not the trees in the background. The clear sky in between the trees on top of the picture can only be explained by daylight or (very unlikely) later photo-editing.
Then there are the natural soft shadows from diffuse illumination indicating a certain early time of day. The absence of harsh contrasts points into that direction as well.
Earlier, when Foch signed the document, this photo was taken:
(src)
More importantly, other sources give another time:
The only known photo of the Copiègne armistice on 11 November 1918 at 7:30 a.m. shows the "winners": front from left: Naval officer George Hope, General Maxime Weygand, Naval officer Rosslyn Wemyss, Marshal Ferdinand Foch, Captain Marriott, Naval officer Jack Marriott. At the top of the stairs Commander Riedinger and the translator Laperche, in front General Desticker and Captain of the Mierry. (Source) (Alternative src, same time given, PDF)
And directly asking google gives this
06:52, Monday, 11. November 1918 (GMT) sunrise in Compiègne, France
Whether it's a typo or not, for me that is still shortly after the signing, as soon as lighting allowed.
The exactness of the minute is of low certainty. Wartime, summer time, double-summer-time, even in November, all factor in. Local time for Germany, solar time at the place, British time; French time should be CET zone as well.
It is doubtful that the photographer really noted the exact time when he took the picture and I suspect that all those times given around the net are pseudo precise, as they all seem to extrapolate from 'reasons'.
Just one thing is sure: those people did not sign the papers, get immediately to a picture and then cable important instructions or celebrate before dawn. The photo was staged sometime after signing and when lighting was good.
Upvote:16
French Wikipedia may be in error here. The English version shows the same photo but no specific time or date for it is mentioned.
Given the timing involved, the 05:30 time may of course well be accurate for the moment the gentlemen left the carriage, but doesn't have to be when the photo was taken.
For such a momentous moment, it's quite feasible that they staged a photo opportunity some time later for example, as it would take time for photographers to be called to the scene.
Another reason to think the actual time of the photo is later than 05:30 in the morning is that Foch wasn't around for the negotiations, arrived only for the signing ceremony (the timing of which isn't mentioned by Wikipedia, but if we assume WW1 era technology they'd likely have a runner sent to Foch's residence and have him return by car to the site, leaving probably up to several hours in between, enough time as well to call in photographers.
Wikipedia states that news of the signing was spread around 09:00, so we can assume the actual signatures were placed (and the photo taken) somewhere between the 05:20 moment it states as the armistice having been agreed upon and 09:00 when it was officially announced to the world.
That gives enough time for the sun to come up (which happens between 7 and 8 in the morning as you say in the area this time of the year).
One caveat: where the Wikipedia article on the armistice states that Foch wasn't there for the negotiations and only arrived for the signing, the article on Foch himself states he was there at 05:00 that morning.
If that's true the signing can indeed have happened at 05:30, in which case the photo can have been taken at any time after that, again leaving time for runners to alert staff photographers and possibly have artificial light brought in to light up the scene (which may have been there already to facilitate the negotiations themselves).
In the end, I guess we can only speculate about the exact timing as sources seem contradictory and we can't really know whether photographers were even present or nearby, let alone how long it would have taken them to arrive on being called.
More post
- 📝 How old was Bagoas when he met Alexander the Great?
- 📝 During WW2, how dependent on Swedish Ball Bearings was Britain?
- 📝 How did Soviet soldiers resist tanks during the battle of Shumshu?
- 📝 Is Caesar's birth year more certain now than it was when disputed by Mommsen?
- 📝 Other than Mr. Putin, has there been occassion of an ex-secret agent becoming the primary executive power holder?
- 📝 Why did no Independent American Indian states ever develop?
- 📝 Was Frederick Douglass right that in his day 'religious slaveholders are the worst'? If so why would this be?
- 📝 Examples of wars without power as a motive
- 📝 Who uses a pre-"Gregorian" calendar and why?
- 📝 How did society regard identical twins in the 17th century in Europe?
- 📝 sense of time in people with no means for time measurement
- 📝 How were laws promulgated in the Middle Ages?
- 📝 What is Seneca the Younger referring to about Pompey's death?
- 📝 Have historians attempted to reconstruct the polytheistic Semitic pantheon, dividing it into sub pantheons?
- 📝 How did the Boston Tea Party protest affect the British?
- 📝 How much of Nazi iconography came from Hitler?
- 📝 Did pagan tribes in the Arab peninsula use bells for superstitious or religious reasons before and with the introduction of Islam?
- 📝 What happened to the S.A. (Sturmabteilung; "Stormtroopers") after The Night of the Long Knives?
- 📝 Cannot find source of quote
- 📝 How useful are mythological king lists and geneologies for historians?
- 📝 Names and Genealogy of Hephtalite rulers?
- 📝 Was it possible to organize a women's uprising or feminist movement in the Middle Ages?
- 📝 Post-war plan for Nazi Germany in Russia?
- 📝 What was the purpose of military prefectures in Song?
- 📝 Are there any historical sources that support the claim that ancient high-speed archers held multiple arrows in their hand?
- 📝 What was the conspiratorial name of Roman Stanislaw Dmowski?
- 📝 Has ramming ever been considered a viable tanking tactic?
- 📝 Were the Quebecois ever considered higher-class because they spoke French?
- 📝 What was the reaction of Western Communist Parties to Kruschev's 1956 speech denouncing Stalin?
- 📝 What is "quarter column"?
Source: stackoverflow.com
Search Posts
Related post
- 📝 Is that armistice wagon photograph authentic?
- 📝 Why did South Korea (and the UN) accept an armistice line that put Seoul in artillery range of North Korea?
- 📝 Could you help me identify this photograph that was taken shortly after World War 2?
- 📝 When did people decide that all caps means the writer is shouting?
- 📝 Do historians agree that most wars are caused by religion?
- 📝 Did Adolf Hitler ever address the fact that his own appearance was almost an exact opposite of what he considered the ideal Aryan appearance?
- 📝 Why is the consensus that WW2 started on September 1, 1939 and not July 7, 1937?
- 📝 Is there any evidence to support the claim that the United States was "suckered into WW1" by Zionists, made by Benjamin Freedman in his 1961 speech?
- 📝 Is it true that "All spicy food is from Latin America"?
- 📝 Have there been any countries that voted themselves out of existence?
- 📝 Is it true that slavery was endemic in Sub-Saharan Africa previous to the establishment of the trans-Atlantic slave trade?
- 📝 Why are so many metros underground? Isn't that more expensive than an elevated system?
- 📝 What are the factors that caused the new world civilizations to be less technologically advanced than the old world?
- 📝 Is the claim that Hitler came to power democratically justified?
- 📝 Are there historical examples of audiences drawn to a work that was "so bad it's good"?
- 📝 When did the Romans finally acknowledge that they were living in an empire?
- 📝 What is the significance behind "40 days" that often appears in the Bible?
- 📝 Is the photograph "England’s Revenge in India" real, staged, or fake?
- 📝 (Why) are there two different versions of the photograph of inmates at the Buchenwald concentration camp?
- 📝 Is there any proof that Robin Hood existed?
- 📝 What led some people to (correctly) believe that there was no land under the ice cap at the North Pole?
- 📝 What is the origin of the stereotype that Polish people lack intelligence?
- 📝 What is the oldest authentic example of people complaining about modern times and the young?
- 📝 How would a king's servants prove that they are on a task given by the king?
- 📝 How did the American Civil War help the U.S economy recover from the Panic of 1857 given that civil wars are extremely destructive?
- 📝 Why did the Royal Society in 1771 believe that a continent further south than Australia should exist?
- 📝 Why is it that the maiden name is traditionally dropped when a woman is getting married?
- 📝 What disruptions were brought about by Islam that the Arabians saw so many victories?
- 📝 What was the first solar eclipse that was demonstrably predicted in advance?
- 📝 Is there any evidence that Cleopatra and Caesarion considered fleeing to India to escape the Romans?