Why was fellatio considered so horrible during the XIX century in Europe?
score:1
As for England and France, and other W. Europe, it is well understandable, because people there were simply horribly dirty. Marquise De Sade, when mentions fellatio, always says about MAKING smb to do it, and mentions the dirty and stinking organ, too.
"For instance, a doctor writing in 1801 remarked that 'most men resident in London and many ladies though accustomed to wash their hands and faces daily, neglect washing their bodies from year to year"
(http://www.alanmacfarlane.com/savage/HYGIENE.PDF)
Don't forget, that toilets appeared in Versaille at the end of 18 century. When Goethe visited Italy in 1840-ties and asked "where is the toilet" in a hotel, he got an answer: "where do you wish".
Nabokov, when travelling Europe during 1920-ties, has to bring an own rubber bathtub with him, for washing facilities for the whole body were not standard in W. Europe even at the start of 20th century.
Of course, Scandinavia was nice exclusion with its saunas.
In Russia, farmers died of hunger often, but they always had +1 building for washing in the yard. And as a result, in Pushkin's diaries a fellatio made by his wife is looked upon as rather a sign of excuse. No horror is meant, definitely.(but it is not Western Europe, of course)
Edit
About from the middle of XIX they started to wash once a month, so they happened to be clean, sometimes at least. They could use oral sex after washing already. So, from the second half of XIX cent. the reason of their disgust was rather inertial.
And of course, to provide arguments about men of power against women without any power is absolutely senseless. The last were simply ordered to do anything and they did. Nobody asked them how did they consider the process
Upvote:2
The problem with this question is that it is one to which we simply cannot give a meaningful answer.
Before we can answer why an attitude prevailed in the past, we must first establish that attitude actually did prevail in the past.
To illustrate this with a somewhat related example.
In certain modern communities there is a reluctance to perform oral sex. This is often supported by evidence from popular culture (one example being the Dizzee Rascal lyric: “I'm not a Bocat, I don’t like the smell”.
Given that evidence, it is then a legitimate question (although probably an anthropological, rather than an historical, one) to ask why that is the case. What is there in their culture and mores that results in that attitude?
(A second problem here is that the minimum age for Stack Exchange is 13. Questions and answers relating to sexual content need to be carefully worded to ensure that they are age appropriate and comply with the SE Code of Conduct. This necessarily includes links to sources to support assertions!
For this reason, I may not always include links to the sources I mention here. People will just have to use their preferred search engine.)
The assertion
The question claims that fellatio was considered "horrible" during the 19th century in Europe. It makes the claim that:
"... basically only prostitutes were to do them and even in this case, only with huge amounts of received money, that, in the case they accepted, which in a lot of cases it wouldn't even happen."
The problem
The assertions are not supported by evidence.
Your question didn't provide a citation to support your assertions. However, in the comments (now in chat) you mentioned the page on Spanish Wikipedia, which I assume is the page on Felación [Warning: explicit content].
Now, this page does include the claim that you mentioned in the comments:
"En el siglo XIX la práctica de la felación estaba mal vista incluso entre las prostitutas. Está registrado que en Madrid las prostitutas podían echarse en cara la práctica de la felación, en forma insultante, unas contra otras."
Translation (via Google)
"In the nineteenth century the practice of fellatio was frowned upon even among prostitutes . It is recorded that prostitutes in Madrid could be reproached with the practice of fellatio, insultingly, against each other."
The source for this claim is given as:
Tratado de Medicina y cirugía legal teórica y práctica, seguido de un compendio de Toxicología, página 359.
translation:
Treaty of Medicine and theoretical and practical legal surgery, followed by a Toxicology compendium, page 359.
This work has been digitised and is available to read or download as a pdf file.
Unfortunately, if you actually look at page 359 of the cited text, that claim is conspicuous by its absence.
That page does mention fellatio (in a section of the book with the slightly curious title: "Crítica de los artículos del Codigo penal relativos á los delitos contra la honestidad" or "Criticism of articles of the Penal Code relating to crimes against honesty"), but makes no mention of prostitutes or their attitude towards the act (or even to the city of Madrid!).
The counter argument
While reference to oral sex may be limited in many of the sources conventionally cited by historians, we have reasonably good evidence for the practice of oral sex in the nineteenth century in the art and language of the period.
In language we see, for example, a number of vernacular English slang terms for fellatio, some of which have been included in Jonathon Green's Timeline for Slang Terms for Sexual Intercourse.
In art, although I will refrain from including images here, we have works by Achille Devéria and Aroldo Bonzagni which portray oral sex (and other practices) [caution advised if searching for images].
One further, rather well-known, example we might consider is the 'fellatio chair' designed by (or, perhaps, for) Queen Victoria's eldest son, 'Bertie' (the future King Edward VII) at the Le Chabanais brothel in Paris in the late nineteenth century.
Personal Hygiene
Now, even without any supporting evidence for the claim that fellatio was considered to be "horrible" in Madrid (or Spain, or Europe), the argument might be put forward that people were extremely dirty in the nineteenth century, and so of course fellatio would be unpleasant! "Most of Europe simply didn't bathe at that time!"
Against that, we might set, for example, the letter from Napoleon to Josephine in the 1790s where he wrote:
"Je reviens en huit jours; ne te laves pas!"
- Lettres d'amour à Joséphine, Fayard, 1981, p155
Translation:
"I'll be back in eight days; do not wash!"
This tells us two things.
It seems that at least some people found the scent of the unwashed body appealing!
Even if she didn't bathe, Josephine did apparently wash herself. Perhaps others did too!
Perhaps not everyone in the nineteenth century was quite as dirty as people often suppose.
On a personal note, I will mention that I have excavated a couple of Victorian cess-pits. The smell is deeply unpleasant and pervasive, but within a very short time the people in the trench hardly notice it.
However, at lunch, other archaeologists on the team do prefer to eat their meal at a distance.
I can also attest that after a day excavating Victorian cess-pits, other commuters will make space for you - even on London's notoriously overcrowded Northern Line!
The point being that, while the people and places would undoubtedly have been malodorous to modern sensibilities, that was the 'normal' for people of the period. The people would simply have been used it.
To say that people would have found it "horrible" is simply projecting modern attitudes onto people of the past.
By extension, arguing that people in the nineteenth century would have found fellatio "horrible" simply because people were dirty is also just projecting modern attitudes onto people of the past.
Perhaps the question that should be asked is rather something along the lines of:
Did the People of Spain in the nineteenth century really find the practice of fellatio so objectionable?
The Spanish Wikipedia page on Felación includes the following claim:
"En el siglo XIX la práctica de la felación estaba mal vista incluso entre las prostitutas. Está registrado que en Madrid las prostitutas podían echarse en cara la práctica de la felación, en forma insultante, unas contra otras."
Translation (via Google)
"In the nineteenth century the practice of fellatio was frowned upon even among prostitutes . It is recorded that prostitutes in Madrid could be reproached with the practice of fellatio, insultingly, against each other."
The source for this claim is given as:
Tratado de Medicina y cirugía legal teórica y práctica, seguido de un compendio de Toxicología, página 359
This work has been digitised and is available to read or download as a pdf file.
Unfortunately, the cited text doesn't actually appear to support the assertion in Wikipedia.
So, did the People of Spain (or anywhere else in Europe for that matter) in the nineteenth century really find the practice of fellatio so objectionable?
As I stated at the start of this answer, until that question is answered, it is simply not possible to offer a meaningful answer to the question of why people felt the practice to be objectionable (or, to use the word in the question, "horrible").
More post
- 📝 Why didn't China assist in the Vietnam War like they did in Korea?
- 📝 In what European countries did non-hereditary nobility exist? (XVII-XIX centuries)
- 📝 When was the concept of electoral districts / constituencies with their own borders (as opposed to pre-existing towns/counties) invented?
- 📝 Was the sprouting of seeds for food production known in Europe before 1800?
- 📝 Was the Maltese Falcon a real historical artifact?
- 📝 Does O Henry's story "Georgia's Ruling" describe history?
- 📝 Has there ever been a society that viewed prostitution as a prestigious vocation?
- 📝 Sculpture identification
- 📝 Why did the Chicago Sanitary and Shipping Canal take a much longer route to the Des Plaines River?
- 📝 Why did the US insist on invading Japan instead of blockading it in WWII?
- 📝 Did Martin Luther King's political outlook change during the civil rights movement?
- 📝 Why Marcus Aurelius did not restore the Roman Republic?
- 📝 Where can I find the official response to Austria from Serbia in the July Crisis?
- 📝 Major power shift in Gaul circa 350 B.C
- 📝 Did anyone ever escape Nazi Germany through KdF trips?
- 📝 Were the arches on medieval bridges large enough to permit river traffic?
- 📝 Why didn't North American tribes use bog iron?
- 📝 Was there a city called "Margorin" or "Margorum" in Prussia in 1885?
- 📝 When the king was away, did their queens sign Acts of Parliament on their behalf?
- 📝 Apart from Veer Savarkar and S.A. Dange, were there any Indian revolutionaries who filed mercy petitions to the British?
- 📝 Incentive to ban women having more than one husband?
- 📝 Why didn't the Wehrmacht pull back to a short frontline in 1945?
- 📝 Did British measures cause starvation in Norway during WWI?
- 📝 Who was the last English king whose first language was French?
- 📝 What was the policy on academic research being published beyond the iron curtain?
- 📝 What is the current consensus on the origins of the Brahmi script?
- 📝 Why could no one reach the southernmost tip of India?
- 📝 Is this cairn/mound-like structure in Germany real or imagined?
- 📝 How late where plumed helmets and muscle cuirasses used by Roman/Byzantine soldiers?
- 📝 Why didn't Delhi became part of Pakistan?
Source: stackoverflow.com
Search Posts
Related post
- 📝 Why was fellatio considered so horrible during the XIX century in Europe?
- 📝 What was the typical peasant's diet like in Europe during the High Middle Ages?
- 📝 Why was there a surge in the US incarceration rate during the 1990s?
- 📝 Why was Switzerland not attacked during the two World Wars?
- 📝 Why was the Roman Empire considered an empire rather than a kingdom (again)?
- 📝 Why was there lack of food during WW2 in the UK?
- 📝 Why were bloody religious wars so incredibly frequent in Europe in the century following the Reformation?
- 📝 During World War I, why were church bells stopped until the war was over?
- 📝 In what ways did the rise of a true middle class in Europe during the late 19th century become apparent?
- 📝 Why was there little nonwhite migration to Europe in the 19th century?
- 📝 What did European people of the 5th century AD eat during spring and what was the availability?
- 📝 Why was the date moved by 10 days instead of 9 during Gregorian calendar reform?
- 📝 Was rape common in Europe during the Middle Ages?
- 📝 Why was a small vessel tied to the deck of the USS Oriskany during scuttling?
- 📝 Why was Truman considered a heavy underdog in the 1948 election?
- 📝 Why was the WW2 air war over Europe fought considerably higher than the Eastern Front?
- 📝 How widespread was literacy in classical Greek in Europe during the medieval period?
- 📝 Why was Poland able to resist the Swedish invasion during the Deluge, but not during the time of Charles XII?
- 📝 Was it widespread during the 17th and 18th Century for British country people to be evicted and replaced with more profitable agriculture?
- 📝 Was there a military practice of reloading while marching/running, in Europe or America during the 18th and 19th centuries?
- 📝 During the 1850’s and 60’s, was the free North (and its cause in the U.S. Civil War) considered more virtuous than the slave-holding South?
- 📝 What was the average percentage of taxes in Europe during the Middle Ages?
- 📝 Was there any Egyptian Pharaoh that was considered the one and only god that ancient Egyptians worshiped during his life?
- 📝 Why is Musselburgh considered the first golf course, when St. Andrews was where golf was first played?
- 📝 Why was the arrival of the Hindenburg considered newsworthy?
- 📝 Why was there an increase in literature regarding fire safety in America during the 1970s?
- 📝 Why haven't bankers gained as much power in China as the Medici got in Europe during their height?
- 📝 Why was Hanford, Washington, selected during World War II as the site of America’s first nuclear energy plant?
- 📝 Why was most of Europe against communism right from the start?
- 📝 What was the biggest shipbuilding centre in Europe during the Second Industrial Revolution?