Why couldn't soldiers sight their own weapons without officers' orders?
score:34
The question asks why British officers would micromanage enlisted troops by doing things like dictating the range to sight their rifles. This type of "micromanaging" is a foundation of the military tactics of that time and one of the key differences between a "military unit" and a "group of men with guns" in the period being discussed.
A few hundred years of warfare using muskets preceded by thousands of years of warfare using bows had left the concept of massed volley fire as a deeply ingrained component of military doctrine, and for good reason since it worked so well. Machineguns were still too new and somewhat uncommon so their impact on infantry tactics was only beginning to emerge. Without a machinegun, massed volley fire was still the best way for units of infantry to engage other units of infantry on a "conventional" battlefield.
At the time of the Boer wars, British infantry doctrine dictated that soldiers would only fire individually when fighting at distances less than 300 yards. Any fighting at distances beyond that was only allowed to occur using volley fire with everybody in the unit firing as a single unit. The only way this type of volley firing can occur is if the unit leader "micromanages" the unit by dictating the distance selected on the rifle sights, dictating the target or target area to engage, when to fire, and when to stop firing.
With this concept of massed fire so deeply ingrained in the military mind and such a foundation of their tactics, infantrymen were taught from the beginning of their training that they are to adjust the range setting on their rifle sights when (and only when) they are ordered to do so by their officer. Discipline is critical to military order and British solders had a well earned reputation for discipline and order. If the officers ordered that sights be adjusted to 500 yards then that is where they were going to stay adjusted until a new order was given. Second guessing orders in the middle of a firefight is not something that a well-trained soldier of that day would ever consider.
And to be clear, when we are talking about adjusting the sights on the rifle in this context we are not talking about zeroing the rifle sights. Some comments in response to another answer seem to be confusing these two concepts. We are talking about soldiers raising the folding "ladder" sight into position for long distance firing and adjusting it to the distance ordered by the unit leader.
This is the rear sight of a Martini-Henry rifle folded down for short range firing or to keep it from being damaged during storage or transport.
And this is the sight raised into position for longer range volley fire.
Another important factor that is not mentioned in the wikipedia article quoted in the question is the effects on bullet trajectory when shooting at a downward or upward angle. The soldiers were shooting down the hill towards their attackers which means the bullet's arc does not "fall" as far relative to the point of aim indicated through the sights. Any British soldiers who were not experienced enough to understand the effects of firing at a downward angle would likely still have been firing too high even if they did flip their sights down to the short range position.
Upvote:70
It was a remnant of the class distinction in British life between aristocratic officers and common soldiers and enlisted men. In British units the men were instructed, forcefully, to simply obey orders without question, with punishment for those who objected. This attitude was why in World War One first the Canadians, and then the other Commonwealth troops refused to serve under British Officers, and insisted in comprising their own divisions.
In Commonwealth units, in both the Boer Wars and First World War, this attitude was soundly rejected. The units were volunteers from closely knit communities, and the junior officers often knew many of the men in their command from prior to enlistment. A mutual trust already existed, with friction in consequence between junior and senior officers in each battalion.
An example of this is the approach to artillery schedules used by the Canadian Corps at Vimy Ridge. The British practice was to issue schedules for the artillery's walking barrage only to officers. For the Canadian assault on Vimy, Currie convinced Byng to issue the orders down to every Corporal, thus enabling troops to maintain the schedule even if officers were killed, wounded or separated during the approach. This, combined with other innovations, allowed the Canadians to be in the German trenches less than 30 seconds after the artillery barrage lifted, often catching the German troops disarmed.
(The above is taken from Pierre Berton's excellent book Vimy).
More post
- 📝 How did tobacco affect the English colonies economically during the 17th Century?
- 📝 What was the status of Arab Christians during the crusades?
- 📝 Are submarine launched ballistic missiles still inaccurate?
- 📝 Was any Church dispensation granted to Henry II and Eleanor of Aquitaine’s marriage?
- 📝 In England, how many Jews died during the persecutions of the crusades during 1190-1200?
- 📝 Power over the centuries: spiritual vs. political vs. economic
- 📝 Are there any examples of California gold rush prospectors becoming exceedingly wealthy due to their claim(s)?
- 📝 What was the role of Nikita Khrushchev during the battle of Stalingrad?
- 📝 What does it mean that Hamilton "made American credit competitive"?
- 📝 Did anyone do Yoga on the Titanic?
- 📝 Did the Vikings use horses in battle?
- 📝 Does History confirm that prosperity, capitalism, and some form "democracy" or representative republican form of government always go hand in hand?
- 📝 Was being in the KKK politically/socially acceptable in early 1900's American South?
- 📝 What were all the countries of the First, Second and Third Worlds, when WWII ended?
- 📝 In 1492, what was the shortest distance you could travel to discover the new world from the old world?
- 📝 How Many Members of US Congress Have Died While In Office?
- 📝 Is the entire history, we read, accurate?
- 📝 How long would the average sword last in the middle ages?
- 📝 What is the origin of Gladiatorial Games?
- 📝 Why did Hitler not concentrate more on North Africa?
- 📝 Who was the English Knight Templar holding command in the Mongol Army?
- 📝 Was Alexander the Great undefeated in every battle?
- 📝 How did WWII change the GDPs of the great empires of the world?
- 📝 What historical situation is comparable to what Europe is currently facing?
- 📝 What was the name of the father of Mesha, king of Moab?
- 📝 Was the speed of the attack at Jena critical to victory?
- 📝 Who would attend a coronation in medieval France?
- 📝 Why did the Soviets refuse to help Nur Mohammed Taraki?
- 📝 Is individual level data from British India censuses (1881 - 1941) available?
- 📝 How is it known that Xenophon saw the ruins of Nineveh?
Source: stackoverflow.com
Search Posts
Related post
- 📝 Why couldn't soldiers sight their own weapons without officers' orders?
- 📝 Historically, why did the US station their nuclear weapons in Germany for delivery through German pilots?
- 📝 Why did some colonies of the British Empire have their own currencies?
- 📝 What was the first instance of native Americans using gunpowder weapons in battle and did they ever make their own powder?
- 📝 Why do soldiers keep their right hand inside the uniform blouse?
- 📝 Why did Britain place naval mines in their own Channel in WW2?
- 📝 Why did the United States Army force Nez Perce to give up their own land?
- 📝 Why did the USA ever test nukes on their own soil?
- 📝 Why didn't Wehrmacht soldiers refuse to kill civilians?
- 📝 Why did Civil War officers tell their men to "aim low"?
- 📝 Has anyone ever named a war after their own country or faction?
- 📝 Why did Greeks and Romans dilute their wine?
- 📝 Why did the Soviet Union name their strongest bomb Tsar Bomba?
- 📝 Why did the United States not resort to nuclear weapons in Vietnam?
- 📝 Why didn't Britain's nuclear weapons deter Argentina from invading the Falklands?
- 📝 Why did the German army execute so few soldiers in World War I compared to most other armies?
- 📝 Why do revolutions "eat their own?" What is the sociological dynamic here?
- 📝 Given their reputation for fighting to the last man in the Pacific, why did 700,000 Japanese troops surrender in Manchuria?
- 📝 Why don't people without access to clean water drink beer anymore?
- 📝 How many different countries could a person alive today have lived in without leaving their hometown?
- 📝 Why did England consistently adopt red as their primary colour for insignia and uniform?
- 📝 Why did Jodrell Bank assist the Soviet Union to collect data from their spacecraft in the mid 1960's?
- 📝 Has any U.S. Vice President cast a tie-breaking vote against their own administration?
- 📝 Why require every ploughman to make his own plough?
- 📝 Why did US Navy WW2 torpedoes detonate at the end of their run?
- 📝 Why would Jesus' parents travel to their birthplace for a Roman census?
- 📝 Why did the German air force lose experienced pilots faster than the Allies, even though they were defending their home airspace?
- 📝 Why did the Arabs start the 1973 War during Ramadan, and did it affect their performance?
- 📝 Why did so few militaries use semi automatic rifles as their standard issue infantry weapon?
- 📝 Why did Nazi soldiers do Hitler's bidding?