Why and how do Creationists agree with microevolution but disagree with the idea of macroevolution
score:7
Micro-evolution is variation within a kind and macro-evolution is said to result from a lot of micro-evolution, but it is really a change of "kind".
Variations within a kind indicate that all the genetic information is already available within the species, but through isolation of features, certain characteristics become more prominent. With the breeding of dogs, this is what takes place--not the creation of new genetic material, but the isolation and selection of the information that is already there.
In Genesis 1, the phrase "according to their own kind" comes up quite a bit. The word kind, I've heard somewhere, could encompass all members of the dog family, including wolves, coyotes, etc.
Macro-evolution requires new information, a change in the chromosome count (at some point), and is by definition different from variations within a kind. So, macro-evolution is definitely not a bunch of variations within a kind. Macro-evolution demands that it break outside of its own kind. No matter how many variations within a kind occur, with the same chromosome count and isolation or selection of information that exists, no new information is ever created and the chromosome counts never change.
Everything we have ever observed falls into variations within a kind, with no chromosome count change and no new information. Fruit flies may have extra wings, but the information for wings was already there. It was just replicated in the wrong spot. The scientific method of observation and replication confirms that things do reproduce after their own kinds.
Macro-evolution has never been observed. What we do observe is different kinds in the fossil record. The assumption that one kind evolved into another is just that--an assumption. The only evidence is similarity, which is circumstantial evidence at best. Finding the bones of a species only tells us that the species existed. It does not tell us it evolved from another.
Again, all observable, repeatable, scientific experimentation confirms that species reproduce after their own kinds. To blindly accept that species reproduce after other kinds just because other kinds exist is certainly not science.
The creation model says that all kinds were created and reproduce after themselves. If we ask whether or not the evidence fits this model, it seems pretty clear that it does. We see "kinds" reproducing after their own kind all the time. Some variations within a kind go extinct, like the dodo bird and others, but they all reproduce after their own kinds.
The evolution model rests on something that has never been observed despite much experimentation, so it rests on something that is presumed to occur despite science's inability to replicate it. When all experimentation fails to support a theory, it usually results in the discarding of that theory. In the case of evolution, however, the philosophical implications appear to be too significant for that to take place.
Upvote:4
My understanding is that a main facet of the Creationist argument is based on the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics. It is stated that entropy poses a huge problem to macro evolution in that all systems over time decay and move from order to disorder. Creationists thus claim that the genetic code of a species will, over time, lose information - not gain information. Therefore, to move from single celled organisms to Human Beings is impossible.
Micro evolution is accepted in the case of natural selection within a species, providing these changes come about by the loss of genetic information. This loss of information, by necessity, has to be beneficial to the survival of said species.
At least, I believe that is the argument.
More post
- 📝 How would they know if Timothy was circumcised or not?
- 📝 What is the basis for saying Mary is not the mother of God from a trinitarian perspective?
- 📝 Does God care about Denominational differences?
- 📝 Why do some people speak in 'tongues' , which have to be interpreted, when angels do not?
- 📝 Why was Yeshoua interpreted as Jesus in the new Testament?
- 📝 Is a belief that the Father, Son and Holy Spirit are not three persons, but one, Modalism?
- 📝 Do angels come in the divine category?
- 📝 Where did the idea of the Trinity come from?
- 📝 Is the resolution not to sin again a must for absolution?
- 📝 Why did Jesus and Elijah act so differently?
- 📝 Catholic and other faith intermarriage
- 📝 How to reconcile God telling Jeremiah to preach to people that won't listen while also saying not to cast your pearls before swine
- 📝 What is the history of the canon of the Bible in terms of 66 or 73 books (Catholic vs. Protestant)?
- 📝 Can theological trends explain reasons for male / female divide in (US) worship?
- 📝 How do the church fathers reconcile the accounts of Jesus calling Peter and Andrew to be apostles?
- 📝 Why do English-speaking Catholics say 'descended into hell' instead of 'descended into Hades' or 'into Sheol'?
- 📝 Is the time-gap as mentioned during Consecration of significance to the Christian faith?
- 📝 Are other religions treated differently by any major branch of Christianity?
- 📝 Epiphaneus: “Martyrdom of Peter and Paul”
- 📝 How is the Son begotten?
- 📝 In Trinitarian theology who created the world?
- 📝 Are there philosophical explanations for why God would allow animals to suffer due to non-human causes?
- 📝 Jesus answered him, "I tell you the truth, today you will be with me in paradise." Luke 23:43
- 📝 Does Exodus 3:14 explain who God is to everyone regardless of time and culture?
- 📝 Did Christian church find it difficult to accept Nicolaus Copernicus' heliocentric theory?
- 📝 What is the Catholic Church's interpretation of 'hunger and thirst for righteousness'?
- 📝 What is the Biblical basis that individual gifts can be revoked by God?
- 📝 Can Christians, in good faith, hold that God is not perfect [i.e. not complete]?
- 📝 Did any Jews have the same canon as Jesus during the time of Christ and did the early church ever quote from it?
- 📝 According to Catholicism, how can a Christian be freed from the concupiscence of the flesh and thereby possess a sinless body?
Source: stackoverflow.com
Search Posts
Related post
- 📝 Why and how do Creationists agree with microevolution but disagree with the idea of macroevolution
- 📝 How do young earth creationists reconcile the age of the universe with the speed of light, and visible distant objects?
- 📝 How do some denominations explain why they interpret the incidents with Elijah and Philip so differently?
- 📝 Why did God allow for the original Bible to be lost to history? And how to reconcile that with Matthew 24:35
- 📝 How does Matthew 25:31-46 ("The Sheep and the Goats") reconcile with salvation by faith?
- 📝 Why Do Moses' Laws About Slavery and Punishment Not Align with the Teachings of Jesus?
- 📝 How do the proponents of the idea that salvation once received cannot be lost explain Hebrews 6:4-6 and 10:26-29?
- 📝 If we will have free will and be sinless in Heaven at the same time, then why did God not create a world with sinless free creatures to begin with?
- 📝 What traditions believe that a woman's relationship with God must go through some man and how do they support it from the Bible?
- 📝 How can Luke 9:49–50 be reconciled with the idea that Christ is the only way?
- 📝 What are the differences between Mormonism and Islam, and how do Mormons react to comparisons with it?
- 📝 Why did Moses have the sons of Levi run about with swords slaying family and friends?
- 📝 Is it known when and why Christians began to sign themselves and impart blessings with the Cross?
- 📝 Why aren't the Oriental and Eastern Orthodox Churches in communion with each other?
- 📝 How do creationists address the similarity between Irreducible Complexity and God Of The Gaps?
- 📝 What do Jews and Christians agree with in the Bible?
- 📝 How can we be with Christ when we die, if Christ has a glorified body and we won't until the resurrection?
- 📝 Why did John the Baptist preach repentance through water baptism and specifically how is that different than repentance through ashes and sackcloth?
- 📝 How do JWs reconcile the belief that Satan was cast to earth in 1914 with Job 1:7 and Job 2:2?
- 📝 Why did the Bishop of Rome accept (and retains until today) the title "Pontifex Maximus" and how were the rights and duties transferred/transformed?
- 📝 According to Catholic teaching, what is the status of a priest who does not agree with the Church's stated teachings on h*m*sexuality and gender?
- 📝 How does one reconcile the idea that physical disability is the result of sin with Exodus 4:11?
- 📝 How was the idea of h*m*ousion developed, and when was this term used prior to the Nicean Council?
- 📝 Do Lutherans believe that the sacraments are necessary for salvation (similar to Catholics), and if so, how do they reconcile this with Sola Fide?
- 📝 How do non-trinitarians reconcile Jesus' claims to be God, and the Father to be God, with the requirement for monotheism?
- 📝 How do Latter-day Saints answer the question of why human beings are not created with a perfect character from the outset?
- 📝 How does the Catholic church deal with the differences between the God described in the old and new Testaments?
- 📝 In Catholic Church History, when, why and by whom did the four living creatures become associated with the four evangelists?
- 📝 Is there a name for the belief that God is not omniscient, but rather is "learning" how to deal with humanity?
- 📝 How do Jehovah’s Witnesses support their belief that only 144,000 persons can be in the New Covenant and go to heaven, there to rule with Christ Jesus