Upvote:1
New Commentary on the [1983] Code of Canon Law pp. 1307,8:
(2) The deceit must bear on a quality of the person "which by its very nature can gravely disturb the partnership of conjugal life." A quality of a person is an inherent or distinguishing characteristic or trait of a person. Isolated actions in the past are not normally considered to be qualities. Thus, the fact that a man once smoked marijuana is not one of his qualities, but the fact that he was once incarcerated for drug possession and, therefore, has a criminal record or that he is a recovering drug addict is one of his qualities.
(3) The quality must be present (or absent) at the time of consent. The quality that is the object of the deceit cannot be one that is expected or hoped for in the future. Thus, a woman who married a man who had led her to believe that he intended to enter law school, even though he had no such intention, cannot claim that her marriage was invalid because of the deceit. On the other hand, a woman who was led to believe that the man she was about to marry already was a lawyer or had been accepted at a law school may have a basis for claiming that her marriage was invalid as a consequence of this deceit.
Exegetical Commentary on the [1983] Code of Canon Law vol. III/2, p. 1298:
the quality that is the object of the deception must refer to the other spouse. This means that the quality cannot be disconnected with and be foreign to the choice of a spouse but must be intrinsic to the selection of a person as spouse.