What is the Christian Doctrine that balances God's self-sufficiency and perfection with His wants or desires?
score:4
The 2 problems
You are correct that if there is something lacking, then there is no perfection in God, so God is perfect. It's also a well established teaching that creation is NOT to complete Him.
First problem: Does it mean God doesn't desire us? How can a God who doesn't desire us be said to love us? Can we understand such a love?
Second problem: Add to this, God's "desire" to be glorified, implied by the answer to Q.1. ("What is the chief end of man?") of the Westminster Shorter Catechism which says "Man's chief end is to glorify God, and to enjoy him forever.", which can dangerously be misunderstood to imply that God is a vain deity who demands praise from His creatures.
The Biblical "data"
The standard mainstream answer, based on God's revelation of Himself in the Bible, that is processed into the classical doctrine of Divine Simplicity, is that God possesses the standard Christian divine attributes which include BOTH those implying perfection such as
- Aseity ("God is so independent that he does not need us", Acts 17:25)
- Immutable ("God cannot change", James 1:17)
- Impassibility ("God cannot suffer" although God does suffer in his human nature, i.e. Jesus on the cross)
AND ALSO other attributes implying emotion:
- Graciousness (Ex 34:5-6: God declaring himself to be "compassionate, gracious, slow to anger, abounding in love and faithfulness")
- Goodness ("God is the final standard of good, and all that God is and does is worthy of approval", which encompasses his kindness, love, grace, mercy and longsuffering (cf Louis Berkhof)
- Love ("God is love", cf 1 John 4:16b, even the "fountain" of love since "We love because He first loved us", cf 1 John 4:19)
The 1st problem sharpened and answered
How can we understand logically that God is perfect YET having emotion (including love, compassion, etc.)? Trinitarian understanding of God conceives the Holy Spirit as the love that spirated between God the Father and God the Son, so in his immanent life God is Love himself. This love then FLOWS OVER into creation (part of God's mission, God's work, God's economy, etc.) which we can conceive as an "art" suffused with God's attributes of perfection, goodness, beauty, etc. which humans (possessing the image of God) can perceive in terms of those qualities, instead of perceiving creation as mere material atoms and energies.
Thus God's transcendence is preserved (creation is external to God) YET we can also say God is immanent in creation because God can be said to be 1) "present" as a particular thing's "ground of existence" (even in mountains, not just trees and animals and human beings) as well as 2) present in rational souls as the Being who has a one-on-one personal relationship with, in love.
True love desires the perfection and the happiness of the beloved as an outgrowth of our love for our own perfection and happiness (thus the greatest commandment: love your neighbor as yourself). True love is a GIFT to which the lover doesn't need recompense. Most human beings cannot love 100% disinterestedly (not is it required) but God can since God does not need us. His love is pure gift.
To His creation which we can like as God's "art", we can understand God's desire and love for us like an artist (say, Mozart) who creates a musical composition (such as The Magic Flute) that can be forgotten / appreciated without reducing/adding anything essential in Mozart's own person or perfection. But God / Mozart desires the recipient (us) to enjoy his musical creation and will be happier to see us becoming a better human being as a result. No analogies is perfect, but I think this best illustrates how God can create WITH desiring the creation's happiness but WITHOUT reducing His perfection.
The 2nd problem sharpened and answered
Recognizing creation as the OUTFLOWING of God's love, human beings naturally want to give thanks and to praise God out of the sheer recognition of the creation's beauty and its origin. God's "desire" to be glorified can then be correctly understood as a prescription for OUR benefit: that the proper functioning of our soul should include the worship of God as our natural response. To not worship and glorify our creator is a defect because it is unnatural not to give thanks to the agent of our existence (thus, it is natural to give thanks to our parents as a secondary agent of our existence). Since God desires our perfection (1st problem), God also desires our worship in this sense, i.e. for our salvation and for our ultimate pleasure as creatures.
P.S.
I still want to find a good resource that substantiate the above answer, which I will edit into this answer later. But I hope this answer is merely a clarification of a well established doctrine.
Upvote:0
O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, killing the prophets and stoning those who are sent to you! How often would I have gathered your children together as a hen gathers her brood under her wings, and you would not! (Luke 13:34)
The above is one of many biblical verses that express God's frustrated longing for mankind's response. Here it is a saying of Jesus (not God the Father) but the OT is replete with parental and marital analogies expressing God's broken Heart because of the failure of human fidelity. (e.g. Hosea 11:2-4, Isaiah 1:2-3, Gen. 6:6, Leviticus 20:26) How do we reconcile this evidence with the idea of an absolute, eternal, unchanging God?
For me the best answer is to understand that although God's love is absolute it remains incomplete, because it seeks an object in us, humanity. God is self-sufficient in terms of Being but s/He will not be absolutely "perfected" until humanity offers a sufficient response for God's happiness. This approach has something in common with Process Theism, in which God's goodness is not doubted by His perfection and self-sufficiency are understood as relational. The following is from the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy:
Process theism does not deny that God is in some respects eternal, immutable, and impassible, but it contradicts the classical view by insisting that God is in some respects temporal, mutable, and passible. The views of Whitehead and Hartshorne should also be distinguished from those that affirm that the divine being, by an act of self-limitation, opens itself to influence from the world. Some neo-Thomists hold this view and a group of Evangelical Christian philosophers, calling themselves “open theists,” promote similar ideas.
We may also see something of this idea in the work of the Jewish theologian Martin Buber, who taught: "God does not want to be believed in, to be debated and defended, but to be realized through us." In other words, God's existence is not completely realized until we ourselves come to fully resemble Him (which for Buber means to become holy, as God is also holy).
Admittedly, to accept this viewpoint requires a redefinition of traditional conception of divine absoluteness. But I see it as the best way to reconcile the biblical evidence of God's unfulfilled desires with the idea of His eternal and absolute Being.
More post
- 📝 Origin of La Madonna Del Gatto
- 📝 Is Christian mysticism an oxymoron or is it a legitimate path for a Christian?
- 📝 What does the Bible say about how we should pray?
- 📝 Should we put God to test?
- 📝 Why do Anglicans have the "give away" optional in Common Worship but obligatory in Anglican Book of Common Prayer?
- 📝 Where is the martyrology in my breviary?
- 📝 What is the Catholic point of view towards animals?
- 📝 Christianity and eating pork or other restrictions from Leviticus
- 📝 How can God be Sovereign (in the Reformed sense) if a man can ignore His call to repentance?
- 📝 What is the greatest sin?
- 📝 How can a Christian seek out the best Homilists/Preachers?
- 📝 Sabbath vs Sunday - Why and who
- 📝 What is the basis for the Roman Catholic teaching regarding the Sin of Presumption?
- 📝 What is the interpretation of the bow in the cloud after the Flood?
- 📝 Did Judas play an important role for God’s salvation?
- 📝 What does it mean that God is the saviour of all people, especially those who believe?
- 📝 Why does God use an army of Angels to fight against evil when he could do it himself?
- 📝 Must you have completed your confirmation to be able to go to confession?
- 📝 Do cases of scientific foreknowledge in the Bible come from Exegesis or Eisegesis?
- 📝 Is faith the only thing we need to attain salvation?
- 📝 Determining literary types in the Bible
- 📝 Is my confession valid if I didn't say the Act of Contrition?
- 📝 Does Nehemiah Gordon self-identify as a Christian?
- 📝 What does "believe the Bible" mean?
- 📝 According to Roman Catholic Church is it only via Jesus you can come in Heaven?
- 📝 At what point in history did Catholic priests begin to be called pastors?
- 📝 How did the early church understand the priesthood?
- 📝 Scriptures that suggest there will be things found in the latter days to support the Bible?
- 📝 Literal or legend: how do Catholics treat non-Biblical miracles?
- 📝 Giving a name while doing circumcision?
Source: stackoverflow.com
Search Posts
Related post
- 📝 What is the Christian Doctrine that balances God's self-sufficiency and perfection with His wants or desires?
- 📝 What is the basis that many mainstream Christian groups justify labeling groups like the Mormons and Jehovah Witnesses as Non-Christians?
- 📝 What did Brigham Young teach regarding Blood Atonement, and is that doctrine still held today in the LDS/Mormon Church?
- 📝 What is the meaning and origin of bridal veils in Christian weddings?
- 📝 What is the purpose and meaning of the Christian Flag?
- 📝 What is the argument and Biblical basis that it is possible to know God from nature?
- 📝 What is the difference between icons and idols in churches that permit icons?
- 📝 What is the origin of the Christmas tree and is it accepted in all Christian traditions?
- 📝 What is the origin of the idea that Matthew, Mark, and Luke didn't mention Lazarus in order to protect him?
- 📝 What is the basis for the claim that the entire New Testament can be reconstructed apart from original and copied manuscripts?
- 📝 Is the English translation of "Book of Mormon" ever revised or updated, and if so, on what basis given that the golden plates have disappeared?
- 📝 What is the Biblical and historical basis for Christian pacifism?
- 📝 What are the differences between the roles of husband and wife in a Christian marriage?
- 📝 What is the Bible and Christian view on Astrology?
- 📝 From where do Jehovah's Witnesses derive the doctrine that Jesus was and now is Michael the Archangel?
- 📝 To what extent does mainstream Christian doctrine teach that knowing a spirit's name gives you power over it?
- 📝 What is the basis for the belief by some groups that a Christian can live a sinless life?
- 📝 What is the nature of the theory for Pope Joan and the evidence that substantiates it?
- 📝 What is the Lutheran doctrine of consubstantiation and how does it differ from transubstantiation and a more general protestant sacramental view?
- 📝 What is the theory that there is more than one "Satan" called, and what is its basis?
- 📝 What is the basis for the idea that the Song of Solomon is about the relationship between God and the church?
- 📝 What is the basis of the view that Jesus was separated from the Father and Holy Spirit upon death?
- 📝 Does the Catholic Church teach that it has the authority to change what is morally right and wrong?
- 📝 What does it mean that Jesus, Father, and Holy Spirit are of the same nature but different personas?
- 📝 What is the biblical basis for the belief held by Jehovah's Witnesses that Jehovah and Jesus Christ are separate entities?
- 📝 What is the basis for the belief that Christianity and Islam worship different gods?
- 📝 What was the difference between Ratramnus's view of the Eucharist and that of Calvin?
- 📝 Why do Latter-day Saints believe that the US Constitution is divinely inspired and what does that mean?
- 📝 What is the Meaning of Hebrews 2:11 - he that sanctifieth and they who are sanctified are all of one
- 📝 What is meant by hot drinks in section 89 of the doctrine and covenant?