Is there tradition in Judaism about seeing God through nine mirrors?
score:2
Yes this is true
Jewish traditionalism is distinguished into the “Halachah” and the “Haggadah.” The Halachah were the settled legal determinations, whereas the Haggadah, according the Alfred Edresheim:
was legend, or story, or moral, or exposition, or discussion, or application—in short, whatever the fancy or predilections of a teacher might choose to make it, so that he could somehow connect it either with Scripture or with a “Halachah.”...one of these rules—the “Gematria” (geometry, calculation)—allowed the interpreter to find out the numerical value of the letters in a word—the Hebrew letters, like the Roman, being also numerals—and to substitute for a word one or more which had the same numerical value. Thus, if in Num. 12:1 we read that Moses was married to an “Ethiopian woman” (in the original, “Cushith”), Onkelos substitutes instead of this, by “gematria,” the words, “of fair appearance”—the numerical value both of Cushith and of the words “of fair appearance” being equally 736. By this substitution the objectionable idea of Moses’ marrying an Ethiopian was at the same time removed. Similarly, the Mishnah maintains that those who loved God were to inherit each 310 worlds, the numerical value of the word “substance” (“Yesh”) in Prov. 8:21 being 310. (SKETCHES OF JEWISH SOCIAL LIFE IN THE DAYS OF CHRIST BY ALFRED EDERSHEIM, P289)
There were various other similar extravagant rules legitimized virtually any superstition and magical interpretation under traditional Rabbinical exegesis.
With respect to this fanciful idea the TDNT makes mention:
ἔσοπτρον. “To see in a glass” also means “to see prophetically.” The Rabbis, when they compare Moses’ knowledge of God with that of other prophets, explain that the latter saw God with the help of nine mirrors (Ez. 43:3) whereas Moses needed only one (Nu. 12:8),2 and that the latter saw Him in clouded mirrors, but Moses in a clear one. (THEOLOGICAL DICTIONARY OF THE NEW TESTAMENT,GERHARD KITTEL GERHARD FRIEDRICH, p1.178)
Apparently the Haggadah styled interpreation arises from the noun ראה, which signifies mirror. The idea of the one and nine mirrors is deduced from the fact that in Nu. 12:8 מַרְאֶה occurs only once, whereas in Ez. 43:3 this and other forms of ראה are found nine times.
Upvote:2
I don't know about Judaism, but I did run across something that sounds like what you're looking for. It's not nine mirrors, but two mirrors, the first with nine facets, and that we can't see God directly or clearly through either of the individual facets, or even in the first mirror.
A TALE OF TWO MIRRORS An Exposition of I Corinthians 13:8-13
An Examination of the Biblical Basis of the Charismatic Movement
by B. L. Turner
It can be found at http://ncbible.org/resources/Tale2Mirrors.html
Note that it is from a Cessationist point of view, a view rejected by those in the Charismatic Churches.
It's an interesting read. It speaks of two mirrors. The first has nine facets. Each of these facets represents a gift, through which we see God, but not fully or partly.
The complete mirror consisted of a mosaic of nine pieces, that is, the nine gifts. Paul asked a series of rhetorical questions which make it quite certain that no one person had all the segments of that first mirror. He asked, “Are all workers of miracles? Have all gifts of healings? Do all speak with tongues? Do all interpret?” (I Corinthians 12:29-30). If the advocates of today’s Tongues Movement could impose their will, all Christians would indeed speak with tongues even though that was never the divine intention. Because no one person had all the segments of that mosaic mirror, sometimes Christians in New Testament times could not use that part of the mirror which they did possess. Paul’s command about that issue makes the point clear. He charged, “If any man speaketh in a tongue...let one interpret: but if there be no interpreter, let him keep silence in the church.” (I Corinthians 14:27-28) Obviously, had every recipient of those special gifts received all the parts of the mirror, that is, all the gifts, an interpreter would always have been present.
To have used one isolated part of that mirror would simply not have given a complete enough reflected image to have been spiritually beneficial or useful. Therefore, it would only have been a novelty or a curiosity. It would have qualified, perhaps, at least, for a short while, as an amus*m*nt to the idly curious, such as the Athenians who sought only to hear or tell some novel thing. (Acts 17:20-21) The use of one isolated part of the mirror would not have contributed to the edifying of the church. Since that was the purpose for which the gifts had been given (I Corinthians 14:5), such a perverted use of those gifts was understandably prohibited.
The second mirror is Scripture, which is, per the teaching, teh perfect mirror, which allows us to make sense of what we see in the first.
From James’ statement it is clear that it is the word of God, not the temporary spiritual gifts which shows the entire image as it truly is and gives complete insight into spiritual reality. If there is any lack of perception where the Scripture is available, it is not because the reflected image is defective. It is because people make a habit of going away (The verb form “goeth” in the older English translations of James 1:24 expresses the habitual or continuous present tense of the verb) and do not habitually continue to look into the word. Similarly, the eth ending of the verbs “looketh” and “continueth” in James 1:25 express the continuous present tense of each verb.
The teaching ends with this:
A Tale of Two Mirrors, then, becomes a story of one beautiful, complete and perfect mirror which exists and is available to anyone who wishes to know the truth. It is the written form of the perfect law of liberty, that is, the New Testament. The other mirror used to exist, but even then it was partial and inadequate. Therefore we should not regret its removal nor seek to have it restored, especially since no one can restore it anyway. The alleged restorations are totally anti-scriptural and are, therefore, fraudulent with no more reality than a mirage.
Every sincere seeker who uses the Perfect Mirror will be able to see the whole picture, the true picture, the past picture and the future picture. Let us, therefore, press on unto perfection! Let us not try to become heirs of those gifts which have passed away, but heirs of “the gift” (Acts 2:38-39) which will abide as long as God is calling sinners to himself, the gift without which, according to Rornans 8:9, no one is a true Christian.
More post
- 📝 What does it mean that Christ experience death for me?
- 📝 Is there a bad part of heaven?
- 📝 In Catholicism, what can the Saints be patrons of?
- 📝 Is there any historical evidence of Sabbath keeping by Gentiles during the first centuries of Christianity?
- 📝 What is the source DNA for the body of Jesus?
- 📝 If a monk dies after been married to a woman, who inherits his legacy?
- 📝 Origin of the (mis)translation "Ten Commandments"
- 📝 Is it impossible to think that after judgment day being thrown into hell and then not existing after that is way worse than being in hell?
- 📝 What is the position of the Episcopal Church on the evolution of man?
- 📝 Do the Catholic Church ex cathedra pronouncements about necessity of Catholicism to be saved still apply?
- 📝 Does the seal of confession apply even when the sin is intended and there is no desire to repent?
- 📝 Do any Early Church Fathers ever argue that the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil (Gen. 2:9) is the Law or Torah?
- 📝 Were any of the Apostolic Fathers Jews?
- 📝 According to Catholicism, is Jesus' resurrected body in a certain location now that it has ascended?
- 📝 Have any married couples been canonized at the same time?
- 📝 What are the foundational texts on biblical interpretation?
- 📝 acts 16 Earthquake
- 📝 How can Jesus be both root and offspring of David if he was only a man and did not pre-exist his incarnation?
- 📝 How does Catholic doctrine differ from LDS doctrine concerning God the Father?
- 📝 Was the Roman Catholic Church responsible for the change of Sabbath to Sunday as day of rest?
- 📝 Have Jehovah's Witnesses ever encountered a demon-possessed person in the mission field or in other contexts?
- 📝 Which is a greater sin - to eat meat on Good Friday or to spoil it
- 📝 How much authority does a father have over his wife and children?
- 📝 Is there a pattern to the occurrences of "reply to the argument for the contrary" section in Aquinas's 𝑆𝑢𝑚𝑚𝑎 𝑇ℎ𝑒𝑜𝑙𝑜𝑔𝑖𝑐𝑎?
- 📝 What is the "Kingdom of God" supposed to be?
- 📝 Saviour of all people, ESPECIALLY of those who believe
- 📝 What are the soteriological implications of Arianism?
- 📝 What is the biblical basis for Jeremiah and John the Baptist being born without original sin?
- 📝 Where did Goliath come from?
- 📝 What are arguments for the divine inspiration of the longer ending of Mark (Mark 16:9-20)?
Source: stackoverflow.com
Search Posts
Related post
- 📝 Is there tradition in Judaism about seeing God through nine mirrors?
- 📝 Is there a mentioning (in the Bible) about why God exists?
- 📝 Is there any connection between minimum age for marriage in Catholic Church and tradition about Mary's age at Annunciation?
- 📝 Is there any Biblical reference strictly speaking about God being timeless?
- 📝 Are there verifiable written reports of Christians praying to God about recent events and receiving supernatural knowledge?
- 📝 Does Luke chapter 16 verses 9 through 13 warn us that there is no middle ground between serving God and serving mammon?
- 📝 According to the Mormon Doctrine, when God said, "let there be light," was He talking about the Light of Christ?
- 📝 Seeing as there is only one mediator between God and man, what’s the role of the prophets?
- 📝 Can God be defined as the idea of seeing everything through the method of thinking you have right then?
- 📝 What was it about the death of Jesus that allows God to forgive us?
- 📝 Are there theological explanations for why God allowed ambiguity to exist in Scripture?
- 📝 What evidence is there to support the position that the Bible is truly the Word of God to mankind?
- 📝 Is there any scripture or literature exploring why God chose not to annihilate Satan?
- 📝 God created male and female.... What about those who do not fit in the box?
- 📝 Is there a biblical basis for God calling one to place one's career above their other duties?
- 📝 Is there any biblical justification for referring to God as Mother?
- 📝 Are there truths that can only be known through spiritual means?
- 📝 Is there any tradition that informs us of how old Mary was when she gave birth to Jesus?
- 📝 What does the Bible say about God being a different type of being than man?
- 📝 Is there a biblical reason to limit information about creation to Genesis?
- 📝 What is the basis for the idea that the Song of Solomon is about the relationship between God and the church?
- 📝 How could the Egyptian magicians do what God did through Moses?
- 📝 Where is the verse about people sinning because they know God will forgive them?
- 📝 Why does Justin Martyr say that those who are unworthy of seeing God will become imprisoned in animal bodies?
- 📝 Is there a way to prove the God of the Bible?
- 📝 Is there only one God (or אֱלֹהִים, or θεός) by nature?
- 📝 If the Bible contains all of the word of God and there can be no more, then why do we need the Nicene Creed?
- 📝 Why was God so specific about how to make the Tabernacle?
- 📝 Is there historical evidence for an atheist argument about the New Testament?
- 📝 What traditions believe that a woman's relationship with God must go through some man and how do they support it from the Bible?