How do you reconcile Hebrews 9:27 with Elijah and Enoch?
score:4
John Calvin says (Commentarium in epistolam ad Hebraeos, translated by John Owen in 1853):
Were any one to object and say, that some had died twice, such as Lazarus, and not once; the answer would be this, - that the Apostle speaks here of the ordinary lot of men; but they are to be excepted from this condition, who shall by an instantaneous change put off corruption, (1 Corinthians 15:51;) for he includes none but those who wait for a long time in the dust for the redemption of their bodies.1
Therefore, he reads this text as referring to a general rule: the scope of the passage is not meant to speak about these various special cases. In particular, Calvin thinks the author is primarily addressing the normal case of people who die once and then stay dead for a long time. The cross-reference inserted by Owen is illuminating; Paul writes there:
Behold, I shew you a mystery; We shall not all sleep, but we shall all be changed. KJV
This chimes with other New Testament references to the living and the dead (traditionally, in English, "the quick and the dead") as in Acts 10:42, 2 Timothy 4:1, 1 Peter 4:5. In 1 Thessalonians 4:15-17, we read:
We which are alive and remain unto the coming of the Lord shall not prevent them which are asleep. For the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God: and the dead in Christ shall rise first: then we which are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air: and so shall we ever be with the Lord. KJV
The fates of Elijah and Enoch are basically this, but earlier: they were taken up by God in the same way, albeit in anticipation of the coming of Christ, rather than after it. They have been seen as prototypes (in the sense of "characteristic or normative" rather than "rudimentary experiments") for the transformation Paul discusses in 1 Corinthians 15.
If we accept Calvin's scoping, then Elijah and Enoch are also explained. Lazarus is not a counterexample to the basic point of the author of Hebrews, and neither are they. In the same way, the judgement of those who are alive at the time of Jesus's return isn't a counterexample either. For one thing, everybody does eventually face a final judgement following the end of their earthly life, whether that period of their existence is terminated by normal death or by something else.
1. Si quis obiiciat, bis quosdam esse mortuos, ut Lazarum et similes: expedita est solutio, apostolum hic de ordinaria hominum conditione disputare, quin etiam ab hoc ordine eximuntur quos subita immutatio corruptione exuet: quia non comprehendit nisi eos qui diu in pulvere corporum suorum redemptionem exspectant.
Upvote:0
Many agree that the TWO WITNESSES of Revelation chap. 11 will be Enoch and Elijah for the reason that they have yet to experience death. God could send them back to Earth a second time through the womb to be born of "water". Wouldn't that be something! Devil never expected that.
More post
- 📝 What is the standard length of assignments for Catholic priests in parishes?
- 📝 Do any Christian traditions hold the belief that Adam was androgynous?
- 📝 Does the Old Testament law prohibit marriage among step siblings?
- 📝 Is the phrase, "Heaven is the presence of God, but Hell is the absence of God" an orthodox viewpoint?
- 📝 What is the basis for the belief by some groups that a Christian can live a sinless life?
- 📝 Why did priests begin to sacrifice?
- 📝 How do open theists respond to 1 John 3:20?
- 📝 What is the biblical support for the Nicene creed's statement of the Son being "eternally begotten"?
- 📝 The Names of the Individual Sundays of Lent
- 📝 Cardinal Cajetan and Martin Luther
- 📝 What is a "just cause" in the context of Code of Canon Law, Canon 308?
- 📝 How are the words of Mary in Luke 1:34 incontrovertible proof of her perpetual virginity?
- 📝 How do Quakers know when to start and stop their church meetings?
- 📝 What is the significance of the Tree of Life in the Garden of Eden?
- 📝 Without Hell, from what does Jesus save?
- 📝 Is the title of Jesus "Son of God" synonymous with "Messiah"?
- 📝 What is the history and explanation as to why the "diaconate" was MIA in the Western Church over a certain period of time?
- 📝 Why do Protestants say: "In Jesus' name. Amen.", whereas Catholics say: "In the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit. Amen."?
- 📝 Before St. Thomas Aquinas, who laid the foundation for the existence of God?
- 📝 Can blood disinfect a house from plague according to Leviticus?
- 📝 If jealousy is sin, how can God be jealous?
- 📝 Is there a patristic precedent for understanding "foreknew" as "foreloved"?
- 📝 Is God of Anger or of Love?
- 📝 Is every Doctor of the Church a Saint? What are the requirements to be made a Doctor of the Church?
- 📝 What did Christ mean in Matthew 10:34?
- 📝 Is penal substitution consistent with divine simplicity?
- 📝 Universalism in the Orthodox Church?
- 📝 Does the Catholic Church believe prostitution should be legalized?
- 📝 What does Paul's "we will judge the world and the angels" mean?
- 📝 According to Trinitarian belief how is Isaiah 48:16 interpreted?
Source: stackoverflow.com
Search Posts
Related post
- 📝 How do you reconcile Hebrews 9:27 with Elijah and Enoch?
- 📝 How do young earth creationists reconcile the age of the universe with the speed of light, and visible distant objects?
- 📝 How does Matthew 25:31-46 ("The Sheep and the Goats") reconcile with salvation by faith?
- 📝 The Mormon Church teaches that Joseph Smith saw God the Father and His Son. How do you reconcile this when the Bible says the Father cannot be seen?
- 📝 How did Pascal reconcile his wager with 2 Corinthians 9:7 and Psalms 50?
- 📝 How do Catholics reconcile a metaphorical Adam and Eve with Original Sin
- 📝 How do JWs reconcile the belief that Satan was cast to earth in 1914 with Job 1:7 and Job 2:2?
- 📝 Do Lutherans believe that the sacraments are necessary for salvation (similar to Catholics), and if so, how do they reconcile this with Sola Fide?
- 📝 From a trinitarian perspective, how do you biblically reconcile Jesus dying and Jesus being God?
- 📝 How do non-trinitarians reconcile Jesus' claims to be God, and the Father to be God, with the requirement for monotheism?
- 📝 How do Latter-day Saints reconcile Moroni 10:3-7 with John 20:24-29 and Mark 16:14?
- 📝 How do Catholic theologians reconcile h*m*ousion with the vulgate translation of Hebrews 1:3?
- 📝 How does the Catholic Church reconcile its doctrine of a divine plan with the disorder and randomness of life?
- 📝 How do some denominations explain why they interpret the incidents with Elijah and Philip so differently?
- 📝 How do you reconcile materialism with the Christian perspective of the soul?
- 📝 Why did God allow for the original Bible to be lost to history? And how to reconcile that with Matthew 24:35
- 📝 How could Jacob wrestle with God if no one can see God and live?
- 📝 How did Peter recognize Elijah and Moses?
- 📝 How does LDS doctrine reconcile monotheism with men becoming gods?
- 📝 How does the Catholic Church reconcile evolution with original sin?
- 📝 How do Christians reconcile God's omnipotence with his omniscience?
- 📝 How do Catholics reconcile Christ's intercessory prayer with the doctrine of the Trinity?
- 📝 How do Christians reconcile archeology with the Bible in the account of the Battle of Jericho?
- 📝 How do "Sola Fide" adherents reconcile with the three aspects of faith?
- 📝 How does one reconcile the sinlessness of Mary with her sin offering in Luke 2:24?
- 📝 How do Christians who reject pre-fall death reconcile their views with the Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction event (66 million years ago)?
- 📝 How do the proponents of the idea that salvation once received cannot be lost explain Hebrews 6:4-6 and 10:26-29?
- 📝 How does a Roman Catholic reconcile a preference for purely procreative sex with the Song of Solomon?
- 📝 How did Easter come to be associated with Eggs, Bunnies and Flowers?
- 📝 How can Christians reconcile the request to prohibit same-sex marriage and the lawfulness of h*m*sexuality itself?