score:2
It does not seem that it would be logically possible to hold Sola Scriptura as the truth and simultaneously to hold that cessationism is not true, at least as cessationism relates to new teachings (prophecies, doctrinal developments, etc). If a true prophet were to speak today, guided by the Holy Spirit, then his words would be binding, since He is speaking for God. Hence, there would be some other infallible authority besides Scripture. Namely, that man's prophetic words. Hence, one could no longer be an adherent of Sola Scriptura were one to believe that man's prophecies.
Therefore, as long as one holds that it is possible for prophecies or other infallible teachings to be handed down by the guidance of the Holy Spirit today (ie not cessationism), one cannot hold that Scripture is the final and sole authority for Christian faith (Sola Scriptura). From this, we can derive the conclusion: if one adheres to Sola Scriptura, one is implicitly a cessationist, at least with regard to new infallible teaching.
Beyond infallible teaching, there is no reason why those who adhere to Sola Scriptura cannot believe that the Holy Spirit sometimes acts to bring about miracles, etc, but nothing He brings about could be new doctrine, nor could it be doctrinal development, as these would require extra-biblical means of conveying Divinely revealed truth.
It should be noted that the converse is not problematic. One might be a cessationist without being an adherent to Sola Scriptura. For instance, one might believe that the Apostles handed down the full deposit of faith through both letters and oral teachings, and that no new infallible teachings will come down until the Last Day, which would entail cessationism, but would put authoritative stock in Early Church oral traditions that were not written in the canon of Scripture.
Upvote:0
No. Sola scriptura doesn't entail cessationism. Actually, Scriptures teach continuanism many times over.
First of all, no scriptures say that there would be no miracle after the death of the apostles. Many passages of the Bible talk about the fact that believers in general will be accompanied by miraculous signs and have miraculous gifts and none of these passages add "believers contemporary to the apostles" or "...as long as the apostles are alive" or something along these lines. The Scriptures also say why these gifts and signs have been given, they have been given "to equip the Church until we reach the stature of Christ" and well, this didn't happen yet.
Second, here are instances of the Scriptures asserting more clearly that the gifts would continue past the days of the apostles:
Finally, God is the same today, yesterday and forever. He performed miracles through his servants from Enoch to John during 4 millenia, why would he suddenly stop altogether for no particular reason? The existence of Scriptures can't be the reasn because the churches already had Scriptures when Agabus prophesied and while Paul was healing people and casting out demons.
So, sola scriptura doesn't support cessationism at all, quite the contrary.
By the way, here's some real-life experience: the current Pastor of my local church used to be Muslim and very hostile to the Gospel. He became Christian because at some point, he became physically blind (completely) and completely paralyzed as well for years, and then one fine day, a lady preached the Gospel to him and the same night while he was alone, Jesus talked to him, healed him from his blindness and told him that he had to go to church and serve him (Jesus). He went to church the next day, not blind anymore, seeing perfectly but still paralyzed. But at church, he was healed and walked. That's how he believed and became a fervent Christian. Cessationism is not reality! My hypothesis is that cessationism was born as a rationalization, a way to cope for religious leaders who realized that they never witnessed signs and wonders like the apostles.