Upvote:0
We can only speculate as to why. "Jesus did not need the praise of demons." is the most common answer I hear.
One that comes to my mind is that demons lie. They mix the truth with the lie so it sounds credible and is accepted as truth.
Also, since we only see text on paper, we have no understanding of what the emotional expressions were in their speech. Could they have sounded like lunatics? shouted in anger? mocked with a sarcastic tone?
What would be the effect on the crowd if they believed he was the Messiah and expected Him to revolt against Rome?
@the-spooniest also gives an excellent response. There could be one or many of a million reasons. Whatever the reason, Jesus knows and He did exactly the right thing and for a good reason...
Ultimately, He loves us! That's why
Upvote:1
While this isn't a question that can be definitively answered, I've heard teaching that links these types of incidents to John 6:1-15, particularly verses 14-15 (NIV quoted here):
14 After the people saw the sign Jesus performed, they began to say, βSurely this is the Prophet who is to come into the world.β 15 Jesus, knowing that they intended to come and make him king by force, withdrew again to a mountain by himself.
In terms of the interpretation of a number of Jesus' miracles, there are three key points that may be relevant to this example:
In other words, the signs Jesus is performing to drive out demons are recorded so that we may know he is the Christ and that he has authority over evil spirits (also read Acts 16:16 for a similar story about Paul, as opposed to the sons of Sceva in Acts 19:11-20). That is why these events are written in Scripture.
However, for those present, Jesus is hiding his Messianic mission in the same way that he hides the secrets of his Kingdom in parables. This is partly because he is acting in obedience to his Father in terms of the timing of the public announcement of his son-ship, and also partly because God respects our freedom and will not force us to have faith in him. This is because a love relationship requires that each person in the relationship has the freedom to choose to love. Because Jesus allows us to reject him, we often see in Scripture that he does not transfigure himself in front of everyone, or do the kinds of signs people demand, or allow demons to proclaim him as Christ, as in many cases these events would almost surely compel people to believe.
So overall, I would say that Jesus acts this way because he doesn't want to compel us to believe, he wants us to freely choose to love and trust him (faith), and Gospels provide us with lots of good reasons to do just that.
Upvote:6
Demons can say pretty much whatever they want, lying or telling the truth as it suits them.
Jesus had already been accused of consorting with demons by such groups as the Sanhedrin (for example, in Matthew 12:24). He refuted those claims, of course, but they kept coming up, so it's likely that at least some people believed them. In that context, a demon claiming that Jesus was the Messiah would have hurt him much more than it helped. His enemies could not only have handwaved it as a lie, they could claim that Jesus had commanded it to lie "to help its master." So commanding them to tell the truth would have done no good. Even if he hadn't commanded them to tell the truth, they could have said it anyway, precisely because it would have hurt him.
So the truth was no good. But it would have been grossly out of Jesus's character to command the demons to lie, and ultimately, it wouldn't have done any good anyway. If they'd said that Jesus was their master, then his enemies would try to claim that this was, in fact, the truth. If they claimed he was an ordinary person -which would have been obviously untrue to anyone nearby- it would have cast more suspicion on him even without anybody saying anything. There is also, of course, the possibility that they could have lied without being commanded, again because it would have hurt him.
In short, anything a demon said would have been used against Jesus, one way or another. He could not allow them to tell the truth, and he could not allow them to lie, so he took a third option: he didn't let them say anything. It was the only way to avoid getting trapped by their words.