How do continuationists respond to the 'closed canon' argument against the continuation of special revelations and sign gifts?
score:3
The principle of ex falso quodlibet applies here: as a false premise can be used to "prove" anything, if the premise of the argument is shown to be invalid, the entire argument falls. So let's examine the premises point-by-point:
- P1: God only gives special revelations to His servants/apostles with the purpose of revealing information that is intended to become part of the Biblical canon.
Invalid logic at best, fatal at worst. If any examples of extrabiblical revelations can be cited, there are only two possible responses: either it invalidates the premise, or the cessationist must claim that it is a false revelation because it's not in the Bible, but this is (the proper usage of!) the fallacy known as "begging the question."
- P2: God only gives sign gifts to His servants/apostles to authenticate their authority as conveyors of inspired messages intended to become part of the Biblical canon.
Directly contradicts the Bible in multiple points. In Mark chapter 16, Jesus says that signs and miracles will "follow them that believe," an exceptionally broad term that does not appear to be narrowly scoped to the apostles. In 1 Corinthians 14, Paul tells believers that they should all seek for the gifts of tongues and prophecy. Joel 2:28 states that "afterward ... I will pour out my spirit upon all flesh; and your sons and your daughters shall prophesy, your old men shall dream dreams, your young men shall see visions." Acts 2:17 quotes this prophecy and clarifies that it refers specifically to "the last days", or in other words, post-biblical times.
- P3: The Biblical canon was closed at the end of the first century.
Not supported by the Bible. As I have written elsewhere on this site,
Nowhere in the Bible does it say that the Bible is complete or closed. (This is partially because the collection of individual works known today as "The Bible" wasn't actually compiled into its present form until centuries after the last of the individual works was written!) The common justification that Revelation 22: 18-19 prohibits "adding to or taking away from" the Bible is clearly invalid in light of this, even before you consider that Revelation was actually written before John's other works, including the Gospel of John itself, and that extremely similar language is found in Deuteronomy chapter 4. (Interpreted literally, that would invalidate the vast majority of the Bible, including the entire New Testament!)
Nowhere in any actual revelation or the writings of any prophet or Apostle does it say anything even resembling "Thus saith the Lord, my words are at an end." The concept emerged during the Reformation as a counter to Catholic traditional teachings that were not found in the Bible and, in the Reformers' view at least, directly contradicted teachings that were found in the Bible. It's a useful rhetorical device, but it is not itself a scriptural doctrine.
In fact, when you look at the history presented in the Bible itself, the concept of a closed canon is always associated with apostate groups. The Samaritans and the Saducees both held positions that diminished or invalidated (to different degrees) the prophets after Moses. Likewise, the Jews in the New Testament time refused to accept the new writings of Jesus's Apostles, and created the Masoretic Text (the basis for the modern Old Testament canon) as a closed work, stating that this was "The Scriptures" and nothing else could hold that status. Sound familiar?
So the first and third of these three premises are on shaky ground at best, and the second is flat-out false if you take the Bible at its word.
Upvote:1
Summary
P1 is false, P2 is false, P3 is false, and unsurprisingly C1 and C2 are false.
The Facts:
Continuationists do not claim canonical revelation.
Continuationists acknowledge no new canon has appeared since the Bible.
The Bible does not say that prophecy and revelation are usually canonical, let alone necessarily canonical. If the only purpose of revelation was the canon, non-canonical prophecy wouldn’t have been going on. P1 is false. (It may be possible to complicate this point, but not change the result. If one claims “special” revelation is by definition canonical, then the statement is vacuously true, but with those definitions it would just mean that the revelation still happening is not “special”. Take care with this definition and argument. In no case can it be claimed that revelation and prophecy in general are canonical, and that’s what matters.)
Signs were so ubiquitous that it’s unreasonable to claim they were only for authentication of authorship of the Bible. I also doubt there is any good case that scripture claims “God only gives sign gifts to His servants/apostles to authenticate their authority as conveyors of inspired messages intended to become part of the Biblical canon.” P2 is false.
(1-3 is enough to make it irrelevant. But on top of all that, I’m almost positive that the Bible never says the canon is closed. P3 is false.)
Conclusion and Support
The idea that assembling the canon is going to be one’s cut-off point should not be conflated with the idea that a closed canon is itself evidence of cessationism.
The Bible contains dozens if not scores of descriptions of non-canonical prophecy.
1 Samuel 19:20 King James Bible
And Saul sent messengers to take David: and when they saw the company of the prophets prophesying, and Samuel standing as appointed over them, the Spirit of God was upon the messengers of Saul, and they also prophesied.
Numbers 11:26 KJV
But there remained two of the men in the camp, the name of the one was Eldad, and the name of the other Medad: and the spirit rested upon them; and they were of them that were written, but went not out unto the tabernacle: and they prophesied in the camp.
1 Peter 1:10-12 KJV
10 Of which salvation the prophets have enquired and searched diligently, who prophesied of the grace that should come unto you:
I could go on. Paul seems to describe a state where every new church is prophesizing, including many individual members of each, very little of which was recorded.
One Possible Root of the Issue
It’s almost as if they claim God intervenes in His universe, enters the hearts and minds and bodies of His followers, heals the sick, saves the world, resurrects the dead.. so we would believe the Bible. Bibliolatry may be involved here. The book is great, but we need to know the author. The Logas of God, translated “The Word of God” is not a document. The Word of God is the Second Person of the Trinity. The words of God, the spirit-breathed divine scriptures, are important, but translating “The Logas”, which is Christ, as “The Word”, and then accidentally confusing that sometimes with scripture... all of that is the background story here. Faith in Christ saves. Not faith in the Bible. Of course they cannot be separated, but a saving relationship with the actual Divine True God (The Logas) doesn’t come solely from a book, or knowledge, without a surrendered heart.
We are clothed and counted as righteous through faith in The Living Christ.
More post
- 📝 Why does God punish people?
- 📝 Is Calvary Chapel a denomination?
- 📝 What is the purpose of marriage in light of 1 Cor 7?
- 📝 Assumption of Mary (Salvific issue) Catholic
- 📝 How do Jehovah's Witness view divorce?
- 📝 What order were the Pauline epistles written, according to evangelical critical scholarship?
- 📝 What is an overview of the main interpretations of "day" in Genesis 1?
- 📝 What is the biblical basis for the belief that people must have children?
- 📝 Does 1st Corinthians chapter 15 say that we will have a permanent physical life?
- 📝 Is Gertrude the Great's mariology considered erroneous in modern Catholicism?
- 📝 Is it appropriate to capitalize pronouns referring to Jesus Christ?
- 📝 Testimonies of the existence of Mary and Joseph
- 📝 According to Catholic tradition, why doesn't God the Father punish ISIS?
- 📝 What authority can move the celebration days of Easter in the Catholic Church?
- 📝 According to Catholicism, can you hit someone in self defence?
- 📝 Where in the bible is Jesus referred to as Jesus bin Miriam?
- 📝 In what countries is Christianity banned?
- 📝 What is the biblical basis for the claim that abortion is immoral?
- 📝 Did the Apostles “worship Jesus” in Luke 24:52?
- 📝 Did the Catholic Church proscribe private ownership and reading of scripture?
- 📝 Why most Christians say Jesus’ resurrection was on a Sunday?
- 📝 How does the Snake in the Desert foreshadow the coming of Jesus?
- 📝 According to Catholicism, is it a gravely sinful act to give shelter to a criminal wanted by the State?
- 📝 Why did Jesus say that "Mary has chosen the better part"?
- 📝 Looking for a passage in the Old Testament
- 📝 Why are all angels masculine?
- 📝 When and why did the devil, or Satan, really emerge as a force in Christian belief?
- 📝 Is the Holy Spirit offered worship at any instance?
- 📝 Are devotional materials in Slavic-speaking Orthodox countries typically translated today?
- 📝 Is there a Christian counterpart to practical kabbalah?
Source: stackoverflow.com
Search Posts
Related post
- 📝 How do continuationists respond to the 'closed canon' argument against the continuation of special revelations and sign gifts?
- 📝 How do Continuationists respond to the "go empty hospitals" objection against the gift of healing?
- 📝 How do non-trinitarians respond to the argument that God is love necessitates the eternity of the Son?
- 📝 How do Latter-day Saints respond to the non-LDS argument that Joseph Smith's death was not comparable to the martyrdom of the ancient apostles?
- 📝 How do non-LDS Christians respond to the stylometry argument for the authenticity of the Book of Mormon?
- 📝 How do Trinitarians respond to syllogistic arguments against the divinity of Jesus?
- 📝 Plato's Cave Allegory - How to respond to the argument in favor of ignorance?
- 📝 How do non-LDS Christians respond to the LDS argument that Joseph Smith died as a Martyr for God, just like the Apostles?
- 📝 How do YEC's Respond to Alexander Pruss's New Testament Argument Against a Young Earth
- 📝 How can one counter-argue this argument against the existence of God?
- 📝 How do proponents of the Fine Tuning argument for God, refute the puddle comparison?
- 📝 What is the Protestant argument against the doctrine of Purgatory?
- 📝 How do Protestants respond to the JW interpretation of John 14:28?
- 📝 How do opponents respond to the Grace Gambit?
- 📝 How do Jehovah's Witnesses respond to the charge that they are false prophets (because their end-of-the-world predictions didn't come true)?
- 📝 What is the modern argument against obligatory head coverings?
- 📝 How do apologists defend against Bart Ehrman's arguments that Church scribes corrected and changed the Bible to fit their theology?
- 📝 How do Christians respond to the criticism that Jesus of Nazareth did not bring world peace?
- 📝 What is the Biblical argument against Limited Atonement?
- 📝 What is the Biblical argument used by Evangelical Christians against the Catholic doctrine of the invocation of the saints?
- 📝 How did Christians respond to abortion in the early Church?
- 📝 How did Gideon win his battle against the Midianites?
- 📝 What is the Protestant argument against Immaculate Conception?
- 📝 How do Continuationists explain the fact that the vast majority of Christians have never personally experienced "overtly miraculous" spiritual gifts?
- 📝 How do Latter-day Saints respond to the claim that the Book of Mormon is based on "Manuscript Found" by Solomon Spaulding? (aka the Spaulding Theory)
- 📝 How do those who hold to a literal interpretation of the flood account respond to the criticism that Noah building the ark would be unfeasible?
- 📝 What is the New Testament argument against Gnosticism?
- 📝 How are the 12 Anathemas of St. Cyril against Nestorius supposed to be read?
- 📝 What is the argument against the ICOC doctrine of "Disciples Baptism"?
- 📝 What is the biblical argument against baptism by sprinkling/pouring?