Upvote:0
Interesting question I read on DW; which I considered worthy of sharing & consideration. I think SN 36.23 might indicate the word "samudhaya" relates to the arising of suffering (rather than to the arising of non-suffering or neutral phenomena). The use of "samudhaya" in SN 36.23 is similar to the use of "samudhaya" in relation to the Four Nutriments (in MN 9, MN 38, etc). Of course, any suttas showing otherwise would invalidate my theory.
MN 148, for example, refers to two cases where the arising of feeling is based on sense contact. The 1st case is leading to suffering and the 2nd case is not leading to suffering. Therefore, the arising of feeling in MN 148 is "neutral" (because the arising of suffering depends on the arising of craving). In MN 148, the word used for the neutral arising of feeling is uppajjati, as follows:
mind consciousness arises dependent on the mind and thoughts. The meeting of the three is contact. Contact is a condition for the arising of what is felt as pleasant, painful, or neutral.
manañca, bhikkhave, paṭicca dhamme ca uppajjati manoviññāṇaṃ, tiṇṇaṃ saṅgati phasso, phassapaccayā uppajjati vedayitaṃ sukhaṃ vā dukkhaṃ vā adukkhamasukhaṃ vā.
Similarly, SN 35.43, which is about knowing the impermanence of feelings without craving leading to Nibbana, uses the word uppajjati:
And the pleasant, painful, or neutral feeling that arises conditioned by eye contact is also impermanent.
Yampidaṃ cakkhusamphassapaccayā uppajjati vedayitaṃ sukhaṃ vā dukkhaṃ vā adukkhamasukhaṃ vā tampi aniccaṃ … pe …
Returning to MN 148, whenever it uses the word "samudhaya", it refers to it in relation to evil defiling suffering things, such as:
When you experience a neutral feeling, if you don’t truly understand that feeling’s origin, ending, gratification, drawback, and escape,
Adukkhamasukhāya vedanāya phuṭṭho samāno tassā vedanāya samudayañca atthaṅgamañca assādañca ādīnavañca nissaraṇañca yathābhūtaṃ nappajānāti.
Now, mendicants, this is the way that leads to the origin of identity.
Ayaṃ kho pana, bhikkhave, sakkāyasamudayagāminī paṭipadā—
You regard the eye like this: ‘This is mine, I am this, this is my self.’
cakkhuṃ ‘etaṃ mama, esohamasmi, eso me attā’ti samanupassati;
Similarly, SN 22.5 says the "arising" ("samudhaya") of the aggregates is attachment. Naturally, attachment is suffering.
And what is the origin of form, feeling, perception, choices, and consciousness?
Ko ca, bhikkhave, rūpassa (sing; gen) samudayo (sing; nom), ko vedanāya samudayo, ko saññāya samudayo, ko saṅkhārānaṃ samudayo, ko viññāṇassa samudayo?
It’s when a mendicant approves, welcomes and keeps clinging.
Idha, bhikkhave, bhikkhu abhinandati abhivadati ajjhosāya tiṭṭhati.
Therefore, in SN 36.23, it appears vedanā samudaya refers to when feeling is arising dependent on ignorance or craving in the stream of dependent origination that ultimately leads to suffering (rather than mere feeling arising dependent on mere sense contact).
Upvote:0
In SN 36.23 buddha says
Taṇhā vedanāsamudayagāminī
And In DN 15 buddha expands this clarification likes this
vedanaṃ paṭicca taṇhā, taṇhaṃ paṭicca pariyesanā, pariyesanaṃ paṭicca lābho, lābhaṃ paṭicca vinicchayo, vinicchayaṃ paṭicca chandarāgo, chandarāgaṃ paṭicca ajjhosānaṃ, ajjhosānaṃ paṭicca pariggaho, pariggahaṃ paṭicca macchariyaṃ, macchariyaṃ paṭicca ārakkho
IN AN 8.83 buddha precisely says that chandamulaka sabbe dhamma.
chandamūlakā, āvuso, sabbe dhammā, manasikārasambhavā sabbe dhammā, phassasamudayā sabbe dhammā, vedanāsamosaraṇā sabbe dhammā, samādhippamukhā sabbe dhammā, satādhipateyyā sabbe dhammā, paññuttarā sabbe dhammā, vimuttisārā sabbe dhammā’ti, ‘Reverends, all things are rooted in desire. Attention produces them. Contact is their origin. Feeling is their meeting place. undistractible-lucidity is their chief. rememberfulness is their ruler. Wisdom is their overseer. Freedom is their core.’
Thus chanda is root cause of everything, which itself is triggered by tanha.
The secreate of PS
Paticca samupada, is not linear. its a whirlpool. each PS triggers next PS. so fast that what you experience is not a cycle but a huge whirlpool. In that sense every node is feeding back to its origin. in that sense you can see reversal is also true. i.e.
if X causes Y then Y also causes X
In DN 15 there is another place where it clearly says viññāṇapaccayā nāmarūpan and in next line he says nāmarūpapaccayā viññāṇa. Thus it is evident that all node are also causing backward.
Upvote:1
Paṭipadā is placing at the same position of upādāna (clinging), so we can find the answer in the sutta that including clinging, craving, and feeling together, such as the four noble truth in Sutta. See Saṃ. Ma. DhammacakkappavattanaSutta:
"Now this, monks, is the noble truth of stress:1 Birth is stressful, aging is stressful, death is stressful; sorrow, lamentation, pain, distress, & despair are stressful; association with the unbeloved is stressful, separation from the loved is stressful, not getting what is wanted is stressful. In short, the five clinging-aggregates are stressful.
"And this, monks, is the noble truth of the origination of stress: the craving that makes for further becoming — accompanied by passion & delight, relishing now here & now there — i.e., craving for sensual pleasure, craving for becoming, craving for non-becoming.
The feeling is an aggregate, and the craving origins clinging-aggregates, so the practicing of craving origin the feeling aggregate. See Sutta. Ma. U. Mahāpuṇṇamasuttaṃ:
"Monk, these are the five clinging-aggregates, i.e., form as a clinging-aggregate, feeling... perception... fabrications... consciousness as a clinging-aggregate."
Therefore, the last question in SN 36.23 is about the noble eightfold path of the four noble truth:
Q:What’s the origin of feeling? katamā nu kho, bhante, vedanā?
...
A: Feeling originates from contact. Phassasamudayā vedanāsamudayo.
...
Q: What’s the practice that leads to the origin of feeling? katamo vedanāsamudayo, katamā vedanāsamudayagāminī paṭipadā?
...
A: Craving is the practice that leads to the origin of feeling. Taṇhā vedanāsamudayagāminī paṭipadā.
...
Q: What’s the cessation of feeling? Katamo vedanānirodho?
...
A: When contact ceases, feeling ceases. Phassanirodhā vedanānirodho.
...
Q: What’s the practice that leads to the cessation of feeling? katamā vedanānirodhagāminī paṭipadā?
...
A: The practice that leads to the cessation of feelings is simply this
noble eightfold path, that is:
Ayameva ariyo aṭṭhaṅgiko maggo vedanānirodhagāminī paṭipadā,
seyyathidaṃ—
right view, right thought, right speech, right action, right
livelihood, right effort, right mindfulness, and right immersion.
sammādiṭṭhi … pe … sammāsamādhi.
...
Upvote:1
Contact is the condition for the arising of feeling. Feeling is the condition for the arising of craving. Craving is the condition for the arising of clinging.
So, how is craving the way that leads to the origin of feeling?
Well, craving is also a latent tendency (raganusaya).
In this way, craving as a latent tendency is the way that leads to the origin of suffering (which is actually the second noble truth, SN 56.11), and feeling is part of this suffering (as stated in SN 36.23).
Ven. Bodhi wrote as commentary (quoted by Piya Tan) on the Cetana Sutta (SN 12.38-40):
sankhārā are referred to elliptically by the expressions yaṁ ceteti, "what one will," and yaṁ pakappeti, "what one plans" (pakappeti is a rare term, apparently synonymous with ceteti). The expression yaṁ anuseti, 'what lies latent within,' points to the anusaya, the latent tendencies, which other texts tell us include the latent tendency of ignorance (avijjânusaya) and the latent tendency of lust or craving (rāgânusaya) [M 1:190 f, 1:303 etc]. Thus, this sutta is stating that when one forms volitions on the basis of ignorance and craving, these volitions become a support which grounds consciousness and establishes it in a new existence. Once consciousness becomes so established, it sets in motion the entire production of the new existence, beginning with birth and ending with death, accompanied by all the attendant suffering.