Why does the London Underground use two live rails instead of just one?
- By
- Aparna Patel
- |
- 7 Aug, 2023
- |
Using +630V instead of +420V is indeed a possible option, and it would make the railroad equipment somewhat simpler and safer. This is what is often done with household electricity in most countries, where only one wire is "live".
It would require better insulators to cope with a higher voltage though. Perhaps such insulators were not available or too expensive when the first railway sections were built, so the voltage was split. And once these first sections have set a de-facto standard, other sections were respecting it for compatibility, even if high voltage insulators became available.
Splitting equally (+/- 315V) would have been better from electrical standpoint, but it seems that the higher height of the 420V insulators is useful in itself, as it prevents the 420V collector shoes from accidentally touching the -210V rail, which is lower.
This addresses one of you sub-questions from a different point of view to AakashM’s answer, which I recommend reading first.
Why not use 630 V and 0 V? Wouldn’t it make one of the rails safe for people?
It would, but the area where the rails are would still be a very dangerous area, both from electricity and from the trains it powers. A tiny reduction in a huge hazard isn’t much use to anyone, and if it increased the risk of faults even slightly, the overall risk may go up as fault-finding isn’t risk-free.
- Why don't hotels offer (at least) 1 kitchen bookable by any guest?
- What is the legal status of travelling with (unprescribed) methadone in your carry-on?
From http://www.trainweb.org/tubeprune/tractioncurr.htm :
Current Rails
All London Underground Lines (including the W & C) operate at 630
volts DC using third (positive) and fourth (negative) current rails.
The current rails are positioned so that the contact surface is higher
than the running rails. This allows the collector shoes on the trains
to pass over the running rails without touching them. The positive
rail is 3 inches higher than the running rails, while the negative
rail is 1.5 inches higher. The positive insulators are thus twice the
height of the negative ones and therefore have about twice the earth
leakage resistance, so the voltages are set with a proportional
disparity between the positive and negative voltage levels. The
positive rail is at a potential of 420 volts above earth and the
negative rail at 210 volts below earth.Why 4 Rails?
The London Underground uses the four rail system for two main reasons.
Firstly, it was originally required by the government to limit the
voltage drop along the line to 7 volts. This was intended to reduce
problems caused by stray currents causing electrolysis affecting
utility pipes and cables. Whilst this did not affect the street
tramways, whose vehicles were not heavy current users, the currents
drawn by trains could cause difficulties. The solution was either to
provide heavy return cables and boosters or to use a fourth rail. The
fourth rail was chosen, partly as a cheaper option and partly for
signalling reasons. As direct current track circuits were to be used
to control signals, an insulated return system for the traction
current was an effective way of separating the two systems.
Nowadays, this is not so much of a problem as all track circuits are
AC.
The National Rail areas that use a third rail have the conductor at a nominal +750V and use the running rails as a 0V return; however, it is still not considered ‘safe’ for untrained people to be on or about the track…
- How do I parse the syntax of the route instruction on a German railway ticket?
- For the Single Entry Schengen visa, do the microstates (Monaco, San Marino and the Vatican City) count?
Credit:stackoverflow.com‘