U.K visitor visa with very old criminal conviction – do I disclose it?

U.K visitor visa with very old criminal conviction – do I disclose it?

10/22/2018 5:38:13 PM

The new Home Office requirement to disclose “spent” convictions is violating both

  • the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974 (as amended by the 2012 Act)
    and
  • the individuals right for private life as was held by the UK Court of Appeal (ruling in January 2013 that the mandatory and blanket disclosure of convictions as part of a criminal records check was incompatible with Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (right to respect for private life))
8/9/2017 8:02:29 AM

If you are “renewing” a 5 year visit visa, it means you previously applied 5 years ago and hence were using the old form…

enter image description here

This has since been replaced with the new form…

enter image description here

And a drill-down page…

enter image description here

Discussion

The old form was accompanied by guidance where the exculpatory provisions of the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act allowed the applicant to lawfully deny a prior conviction if it was ‘spent’. This explains why you did not declare your conviction in earlier visa applications.

The “Five Eyes Members” didn’t like this because the various definitions of ‘spent conviction’ could not be easily normalised. So in the UK’s new form you will see the text on the form itself…

You must tell us about spent as well as unspent convictions.

That means you must disclose the whole enchilada or face a ban for deception if you get caught.

Disclosing something ugly from your background does not mean the ECO will immediately shout “OMG!” and flip out. They have a mandate from Parliament to get as many visitors in to the UK as prudently possible. There’s a related article from last month here that makes the following statement…

Disclosing something on a visa application does not result in
instantaneous refusal. People put all kinds of weird things on their
applications and still get approved: nude photographs, an old flight
jacket, microwave parts, ultrasound scans, parking tickets, a jar of
nuts, eBay passwords, an autographed dollar bill… you name it. Visa
officers are trained professionals who will filter out material that
is innocuous, irrelevant, or superfluous. This includes an admission
of guilt about something they don’t care about.

Source: Clarification Regarding Invalid Application

In your case the ECO (or assistant) will look in their manual and determine that there has been a substantial change in circumstances since your conviction and it is already spent in the first instance. It’s not an overly big deal, but you may (or may not) be tasked with locating some paperwork.

Your questions…

Now I am applying for my new 5 year visas and I intend to answer
truthfully about previous conviction (previously I answered no because
my conviction was spent and I expunged my record.) I want to answer
yes and explain it. Is that the right thing to do?

Per the above discussion, you are required to make a full disclosure.

Should I answer yes to the question about having a different name even
though it was something as simple as spelling Bryan instead of Brian
or Teresa and Theresa — not really changing it and never thought of
it as a change.

Yes, a variance must be reported. They do not have an arbitrary exclusion like just a single letter or a simple spelling error or any other excuse. If you have doubts about the question, you can use the natural meaning of the words to determine what they want to know.

Credit:stackoverflow.com‘

About me

Hello,My name is Aparna Patel,I’m a Travel Blogger and Photographer who travel the world full-time with my hubby.I like to share my travel experience.

Search Posts

Latest posts

Popular posts