Reading the officier’s reply to your application, I deem this a lost cause.
Being Nigerian is already not the greatest starting position for being admitted to the UK to begin with. After all “keep Africans out” was one of the main reasons a lot of people voted for Brexit. Thus, in order to have any reasonable chance, your application should be absolutely flawless.
This includes, among other things, plausibly demonstrating that you have enough assets to sustain yourself and to allow you to leave again after some weeks (and, enough assets abroad to be motivated to leave!). Because, let’s be honest, they might allow you limited entry, but they don’t want you to stay.
The officer’s reply, while very polite and very factual, is also very clear. It says nothing but: “You liar!” (in very polite words). Whether or not you are actually being truthful, or whether or not there is maybe only a misunderstanding really doesn’t matter an awful lot now. From what will be recorded in your file (“rejected 4 times, untruthful”), you are burned.
The next officer receiving your next application will 99.99% certain enter your name into the computer, see this note, and close the application.
In the officer’s opinion, you made non-credible, doubtful statements about your earnings, in particular he found it surprising that someone earning £42,000 per month after tax in Nigeria would move to the Emirates for no apparent reason to earn £12,000 per year.
You will admit that all in all, this indeed looks a bit “strange” without further explanation. The 99th percentile is at 108k in the UK, which means less than 1% of the population earns more than 108k per year. Your claimed salary in Nigeria was almost 5 times as much (4 times as much as the Prime Minister!). So basically, you must be the richest man in Nigeria, or something.
It is rather safe to assume that someone with such a salary would not go working as EA for some unknown publishing company. Not unless there is a very, very, very urgent, compelling reason to do so, which you did not provide.
I am guessing that most likely there was simply a mistake somewhere in your numbers (maybe you confused monthly with yearly salary or GBP with AED, or both), but whatever it is, it doesn’t matter now. The officer concluded this looked way too suspicious, and that’s it.
The officer also wasn’t convinced that you had assets (a house?) in the Emirates which would motivate you to leave UK again.
So, although it says “future applications will be considered based on their individual merits”, I think this is merely a flowery phrase, your case is pretty hopeless.
You are in a tail-spin of ‘serial refusals’ and there’s a lot of overlap between your question and the question linked to above: I have had five UK visa refusals
The refusal notices will be different, but it’s no longer about substance. At this point it really doesn’t matter what specific reasons they are giving, serial refusals take on a life of their own when UKVI’s decision-makers decide that you have a fixation on entering the UK. Once that happens they will begin using the dreaded ‘discrepancy method‘. You have been experiencing it in your various applications, but probably didn’t have the ‘academic’ term for it (as defined by Gina Clayton).
Your question is not a total duplicate because you reveal that you have been using an ‘agent’ to manage your applications. This is a mistake that should be rectified before even considering another application.
We don’t know enough about your ‘agent’ to know if you have been scammed, it’s sufficient to know that your ‘agent’ is not a regulated one (or they would have put the brakes on a long time ago).
So short and sweet. And knowing that the linked question is providing a canonical answer about serial refusals, I can sign post you to a brochure published by the Commissioner: “Risks of unregulated immigration advice“.
Advisers must be open and honest with you about your prospects of
success and should only advise you to proceed with an application if
you have a realistic chance of being granted leave to enter or remain
in the UK.
You will see that there are several bodies that can authorise a person to provide immigration services, I always recommend the UK Law Society because their members can represent anywhere from the lowest to the highest levels of the process.
And to avoid confusion, the UK Law Society has corresponding members all over the planet (they are not solely British and not solely UK-based).
You can use the search facility at ILPA to find an appropriate one for your own situation.
Credit:stackoverflow.com‘
4 Mar, 2024
4 Mar, 2024
4 Mar, 2024
5 Mar, 2024